CIBIC Plus-J Assessment Using a Videotaped Method in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients
Autor: | Akira Homma, Masahiro Shigeta, Katsuya Urakami, Yukimichi Imai, Mikiko Usui, Masashi Takita, Hiroshi Kita, Takashi Nishikawa, Yu Nakamura |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Cognitive Neuroscience Confidential interval Alzheimer's disease lcsh:Geriatrics Reliability lcsh:RC346-429 Psychiatry and Mental health lcsh:RC952-954.6 Japanese language CIBIC plus-J Physical therapy medicine Dementia Original Research Article Psychology Psychiatry Alzheimer’s disease Kappa lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system |
Zdroj: | Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 271-277 (2012) Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders EXTRA |
ISSN: | 1664-5464 |
Popis: | Background/Aims: CIBIC plus-J is the Japanese language version equivalent to CIBIC plus. Variability of CIBIC plus-J arises among raters in accordance with their experience and their memories of patients’ conditions at baseline. Therefore, in a multicenter trial of Alzheimer’s disease, CIBIC plus-J interviews with Alzheimer’s disease patients were videotaped, and the tapes were assessed by central raters as a means to improve the reliability of CIBIC plus-J assessment. Methods: Two of eight central raters were randomly selected and independently assessed the CIBIC plus-J of each patient. Results: CIBIC plus-J of 41 patients was assessed. The agreement rate between the two raters was 46.3% (19/41), when two raters assessed the CIBIC plus-J of the same patient. However, when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement rate was 97.6% (40/41). Although the kappa coefficients contained coincidence, simple and quadratic weighted kappa coefficients [95% confidential interval (CI)] were 0.226 (0.066–0.386) and 0.633 (0.507–0.759), respectively, and when considering disagreement between adjacent points as ‘agree’, the agreement kappa was 0.896 (0.752–1.041). The interclass coefficient from the two-way layout model was 0.639. Conclusion: The reliability of the CIBIC plus-J assessment with the videotaped method was acceptable. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |