Short versus long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: A randomized clinical trial
| Autor: | Godwin O Akaba, Thairu Yunusa, AY Isah, James A Adaji |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Antibiotics
cesarean section postoperative prophylaxis wound infection cesarean section business.industry medicine.drug_class Incidence (epidemiology) Antibiotics General Medicine medicine.disease law.invention Regimen Metronidazole Randomized controlled trial law Anesthesia postoperative wound infection Medicine Original Article prophylaxis Endometritis Antibiotic prophylaxis business Cefuroxime medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association Nigerian Medical Journal; Vol. 61 No. 4 (2020); 173-179 |
| ISSN: | 0300-1652 2229-774X |
| DOI: | 10.4103/nmj.nmj_197_20 |
| Popis: | Objective: The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) 48 h course of cefuroxime/metronidazole with long‑term course using 48 h cefuroxime/metronidazole plus 5 days oral regimen of cefuroxime and metronidazole for the prevention of post cesarean section wound infection. Methods: Two hundred and forty‑eight women were randomized into two equal groups. Women in each arm of the study received IV cefuroxime 750 mg twelve hourly and IV metronidazole 400 mg eight hourly for 48 h. Those in the long‑term arm received additional tablets of cefuroxime 500 mg twelve hourly and Tabs 400 mg of metronidazole eight hourly for 5 days. After the surgery, surgical site infections were evaluated. Length of hospital stay and the cost of antibiotics were also assessed. Results: The wound infection rate was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (1.3% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.136). The incidence of endometritis was 2.1%, with no statistically significant difference seen between the two groups (0.4% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.213). Escherichia coli was the most common isolate seen in 36.4% of infected wounds. The short arm group stayed for significantly shorter days in the hospital (2.9 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ± 1.1 days, P < 0.001), and the cost of antibiotics was also significantly less in the short arm group (P < 0.001). Organisms associated with nosocomial infections were seen only in the long arm that stayed in the hospital for longer days. Conclusions: Short‑term prophylactic antibiotics are as effective as long‑term prophylaxis and have other benefits such as shorter duration of hospital stay, reduced cost of antibiotics, and reduction of nosocomial infections. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|