Estimation of radiation exposure of children undergoing superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma treatment: assessment of local diagnostic reference levels as a function of age, sex, and interventional success

Autor: Marcel Opitz, Denise Bos, Cornelius Deuschl, Alexander Radbruch, Sebastian Zensen, Selma Sirin, Michael Forsting, Nikolaos Bechrakis, Eva Biewald, Norbert Bornfeld, Petra Ketteler, Beate Timmermann, Martin Stuschke, Maja Guberina, Axel Wetter, Sophia Göricke, Nika Guberina
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
0028-3940
Popis: Purpose This study aims to determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) procedures of pediatric patients with retinoblastoma (RB) to provide data for establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in pediatric interventional radiology (IR). Methods In a retrospective study design, LDRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for children undergoing superselective IAC for RB treatment. All procedures were performed at the flat-panel angiography systems (I) ArtisQ biplane (Siemens Healthineers) and (II) Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Patients were differentiated according to age (A1: 1–3 months; A2: 4–12 months; A3: 13–72 months; A4: 73 months–10 years; A5: > 10 years), sex, conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy. Results 248 neurointerventional procedures of 130 pediatric patients (median age 14.5 months, range 5–127 months) with RB (68 unilateral, 62 bilateral) could be included between January 2010 and March 2020. The following diagnostic reference values, AD, and mean values could be determined: (A2) DRL 3.9 Gy cm2, AD 2.9 Gy cm2, mean 3.5 Gy cm2; (A3) DRL 7.0 Gy cm2, AD 4.3 Gy cm2, mean 6.0 Gy cm2; (A4) DRL 14.5 Gy cm2, AD 10.7 Gy cm2, mean 10.8 Gy cm2; (A5) AD 8.8 Gy cm2, mean 8.8 Gy cm2. Kruskal-Wallis-test confirmed a significant dose difference between the examined age groups (A2–A5) (p p = 0.076) and conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy (p = 0.627). A successful procedure was achieved in 207/248 cases. Conclusion We report on radiation exposure during superselective IAC of a pediatric cohort at the German Retinoblastoma Referral Centre. Although an IAC formally represents a therapeutic procedure, our results confirm that radiation exposure lies within the exposure of a diagnostic interventional procedure. DRLs for superselective IAC are substantially lower compared with DRLs of more complex endovascular interventions.
Databáze: OpenAIRE