Paralamyctes (Paralamyctes) rahuensis Edgecombe, 2004, n. sp

Autor: Edgecombe, Gregory D.
Rok vydání: 2004
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6272892
Popis: Paralamyctes (Paralamyctes) rahuensis n. sp. Figs. 1���31 Diagnosis: P. (Paralamyctes) with 17���20 antennal articles; 4 + 4 to 5 + 5 teeth on dental margin of maxillipede coxosternum, each half of dental margin nearly transverse; few (3��� 6) apical setae on coxal process of first maxilla; band of 6���7 setae on each coxa of second maxilla; branching bristles on mandible with abundant slender hairs; distal spinose projections on tibia of legs 1���14; posterior margins of sternites lacking setae except for seta at posterolateral corner; female gonopod with pair of small, conical spurs. Holotype: CMNZ 2004.19. 1, female (Fig. 1), Rahu Scenic Reserve, 2.5 km W of Springs Junction, South Island, New Zealand, 42 �� 19 '56.1"S 172 �� 10 '16.6"E, 437 m, 31 January 2003, S. Boyer, C. D���Haese & G. Giribet, closed Nothofagus forest. Paratypes: CMNZ 2004.19. 2, female (Figs. 3���19, 24, 27���30), from type locality, same collection; CMNZ 2004.19. 3 (Figs. 23, 25, 26, 31)��2004.19.5, 3 females, from type locality, 3 February 2004, G.D. Edgecombe & Z. Johanson; CMNZ 2004.19. 6, female (Figs. 2, 20���22), Reefton Saddle, 14 November 1974, P.M. Johns. Etymology: For Rahu Scenic Reserve, the type locality. Description: Length of body (anterior margin of head shield to posterior end of telson) up to 20 mm; length of head shield up to 1.9 mm. Colour (based on specimens in absolute ethanol): antenna and maxillipede pale orange; head shield yellow/pale orange with purple/brown mottled network; tergites drab yellow with purple longitudinal median band, paler purple mottled bands laterally on TT 1���5; legs pale yellow on trochanter and prefemur, purple tinge on femur and tibia, orange on tarsus. Head shield smooth, 93���100 % width of widest tergite (T 10). Anterior margin with moderately strong median notch; longitudinal median furrow impressed to transverse suture. Posterior margin of head shield transverse or weakly concave. Antenna 3 ���3.4 times length of head shield, with 17 (N= 5: Rahu Scenic Reserve) or 20 (N= 1: Reefton Saddle) articles. Basal two articles moderately larger than succeeding few (Fig. 10); all articles longer than wide, nearly all considerably so, including numerous tubular articles twice as long as wide with trichoid sensilla arranged in 10 or 11 imprecisely��arranged whorls (Fig. 11). Single clavate or slightly spatulate thin��walled basiconic sensillum on outer dorsal margin at anterior edge of each of articles 3���16 in specimen with 17 articles, exceptionally a pair of sensilla (Fig. 12); single similar basiconic sensillum near apex of terminal article on its dorsal side, just behind cluster of apical sensilla brachyconica (Fig. 13). Ocellus domed, with lavender pigment. T��m��sv��ry organ moderately large, relatively strongly recessed, at anterior edge of cephalic pleurite on ventral margin of head (Fig. 9). Clypeus with band of four or six setae medially just in front of labrum (Fig. 8). Labral margin redirected backwards against fringe of branching bristles; fringe dense, each bristle with many short, slender, hair��like branches along its length. Maxillipede: coxosternum broadly subquadrate (Fig. 16); each dental margin nearly straight, transverse across dentate extent (inner two��thirds), then gently sloping backwards distally; teeth small, blunt, of equal size or with smaller (sometimes minute) inner tooth, 4 + 4 (N= 1), 5 + 4 (N= 1) or 5 + 5 (N= 4); median notch absent (Fig. 19). Coxosternum moderately setose, with majority of setae concentrated anterolaterally (Fig. 2). Pretarsal part of tarsungulum 1.6���1.8 times length of tarsal part; inner margin of tarsungulum, tibia and femur with a few setae longer than those on outer and ventral sides but with similar density of setation (Fig. 18). Mandible: four paired teeth (Fig. 26). 10���11 aciculae; 9���13 stout pinnules with pointed tips aligned against each other on distal half on dorsal side of each acicula (Figs. 27, 28). Fringe of branching bristles with slender ventral bristles, densely covered with slender hair��like branchings to their bases (Fig. 29); each bristle terminates with a row of slender branches that are about twice as thick and distinctly longer than all others; fringe grades dorsally into progressively narrower band of bristles that tapers out near furry pad (Fig. 31). Dorsal three teeth with grooved ridge bounded by a row of strong, triangular accessory denticles (Fig. 30); remainder of accessory denticles likewise angular, becoming smaller and more slender towards bases of teeth; accessory denticles near furry pad elongate, distally bifurcate; furry pad a dense cluster of mostly simple, elongate bristles (Fig. 31). First maxilla: large, bell��shaped sternite set in arthrodial membrane, as typical of genus (Fig. 24). Apex of coxal process bearing three to six simple setae (Fig. 25). Distal article of telopodite with numerous paired plumose bristles along inner margin; row of shorter simple setae near bases of plumose bristles; several (approximately seven) simple setae scattered on rest of ventral surface of distal article. Second maxilla: Anterior margin of coxa straight; band of six or seven setae across anterior part of coxa (Fig. 15). Approximately 12 plumose setae on inner surface of tarsus. Claw composed of five digits, median and outer pair long, thick, these separated by a digit about half as thick and two��thirds as long (Fig. 14). Tergites gently wrinkled; T 1 90���95 % width of head shield, trapezoidal (Fig. 1); TT 3 and 5 with parallel lateral margins, posterior angles rounded; posterior margins of TT 1, 3 and 5 transverse (T 5 variably gently concave); posterior margin of T 7 concave, without angular ���notch���, posterior angle slightly projected; posterior margins of TT 8 and 10 transverse or faintly concave; posterior margin of T 12 gently concave; posterior angle of T 8 rounded, TT 10 and 12 form obtuse, blunt corners; posteromedian margin of T 9 transverse, lateral part flexed backwards to form a weak projection; posteromedian margin of TT 11 and 13 gently convex, lateral parts flexed backwards as short projections, without teeth; posterior margin of T 14 gently concave, with sharp posterior angles lacking projection; posterior margin of tergite of intermediate segment transverse in female, with rounded posterior angle. Tergites of first genital segment and telson well sclerotised in female but only lightly pigmented. Several fine, short to moderately long setae along lateral borders of tergites; a few scattered setae on anterior part of tergites and all over TT 12 and 14; 10 or 12 setae across posterior margins of TT 11���13. Sternites with band of six setae across anterior third; four or five setae along lateral margins of sternites, including one at posterolateral corner; additional setae lacking along posterior sternal margins. Longitudinal median furrow on anterior half of sternites. Lengths of legs 12���15 with the ratios 1: 1.1: 1.4: 1.8 (Figs. 4���7). Joint between two tarsomeres fairly strong on legs 1���12, more pronounced on legs 13���15. Strong distal spinose projections of tibia of legs 1���14, lacking on leg 15. Leg 15 distitarsus 60���65 % length of basitarsus; basitarsus 10���12 times longer than maximal width (Fig. 7). Coarsest setae on tarsus of legs 1���13 only slightly finer than those on prefemur��tibia; basitarsus variably more sparsely setose than distitarsus on legs 14���15. Anterior and posterior accessory claws on all legs, both based on the dorsolateral side of main claw (Fig. 22), nearly equal in size, gently divergent (Fig. 20). One large scute along most of length of accessory claw on its dorsal side; entire surface of accessory claws ornamented with narrow ridges and grooves (Fig. 21). Scutes well defined along length of main claw, including its proximodorsal surface (Fig. 21). Posteroventral spine relatively short, about 10 % length of main claw; subsidiary spine at it base more than one��third length of posteroventral spine. About six rimmed pores at margins of scutes on anterior and posterior sides of main claw beneath the accessory claws (Fig. 22). 4,4,4,4/4,4,4,4 or 4,5,4,5/4,4,4,5 coxal pores in female, all round, inner pore smallest (Fig. 3). Coxal pore row set off from rest of coxa by a sharp fold against outer pore, grading into a rounded curve against more proximal pores. Female (Fig. 3): Sternite of segment 15 with transverse posteromedial margin. First genital sternite with 10���12 setae in front of posterior margin, two rows of short setae across its width near midlength. Gonopod with 6���13 setae on basal article (Fig. 23), four on second article, one or two two large setae on third as well as one or two small setae on ventromedial side. Spurs small, conical, evenly tapering to a blunt point; inner spur varying from slightly shorter and narrower than outer spur to as little as half width and twothirds length of outer spur. Claw small, entire. Discussion: All six known specimens of Paralamyctes (Paralamyctes) rahuensis are females. A larger sample size is required to test the possibility of parthenogenesis, as has been documented in some species of Lamyctes (Enghoff 1975; Edgecombe & Giribet 2003 b). Paralamyctes rahuensis is most similar to P. (Paralamyctes) harrisi Archey, 1922, from North Island, New Zealand, and P. (Paralamyctes) monteithi Edgecombe, 2001, from Queensland, Australia. All of these species, as well as P. (Paralamyctes) tridens Lawrence, 1960, from Madagascar, share a positioning of the T��m��sv��ry organ on the ventral margin of the head (Figs. 8, 9) that is unique to this group. To test the phylogenetic status of this and other characters, morphological characters that vary within Paralamyctes and outgroup Henicopini were extracted from a published dataset (Edgecombe 2003 c). Of 57 characters used for higher��level systematics of Henicopidae, 33 are informative for Paralamyctes and the selected outgroups, two species of each of Henicops and Lamyctes (Appendix and Table 1). One new character (character 28 in Table 1) was added here. All other characters are documented in previous studies (Edgecombe 2003 c, 2004). Multistate characters are unordered. Parsimony analysis of the morphological data was executed with PAUP * version 4.0b 10 (Swofford 2002). A heuristic search used 1000 random stepwise addition replicates and TBR (Tree Bisection and Reconnection) branch swapping, retaining up to 10 trees per replicate, then swapping on those trees to completion. Support for nodes was quantified by parsimony jackknifing (Farris et al. 1996), with 1000 replicates having 33 % character deletion. Bremer support (Bremer 1994) was computed by the ���enforce converse constraints��� command in PAUP *, using MacClade version 4.0 (Maddison & Maddison 2000) to generate the PAUP * command file with converse constraints. Analysis of the data yielded 12 shortest cladograms of 66 steps (Consistency Index 0.62; Retention Index 0.80; Rescaled Consistency Index 0.49). The strict consensus of these cladograms is shown in Fig. 32. Within Paralamyctes, the subgenera Nothofagobius, Paralamyctes and Thingathinga each form monophyletic groups, all with jackknife frequencies above 75 % and Bremer support of 2 or more. Paralamyctes (Haasiella) sensu Edgecombe (2004) is variably either monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to P. (Thingathinga); monophyly of P. (Haasiella) is found in 51 % of jackknife replicates. The 12 cladograms differ in variable interelationships of two species from southern Africa, P. (Paralamyctes) prendinii and P. (P.) spenceri, which are variably allied either with other species from South Africa (clade composed of P. w e b e r i, P. asperulus and P. l e v i g a t u s) or to a Malagasy��Australasian clade discussed below. The positioning of the T��m��sv��ry organ on the margin of the head (character 3, state 1) is optimised on the cladogram in Fig. 32 as a synapomorphy for the Malagasy P. (P.) tridens and an Australasian clade composed of P. (P.) rahuensis, P. (P.) harrisi and P. (P.) monteithi. Apomorphic characters for the rahuensis + harrisi + monteith clade (present in 85 % of jackknife replicates; Bremer support of 2) are an elongation of the antennal articles (character 2: Fig. 11), a shouldered labral margin (character 5), and distal spinose projections on the tibia of leg 14 (character 23, state 3). The new species, P. (P.) rahuensis, is distinguished from both P. (P.) harrisi and P. (P.) monteithi, which unite as sister species, by its fewer setae on the apex of the coxal process of the first maxilla (Fig. 25), denser hairlike branches on the ventral bristles in the mandibular fringe (Fig. 29), and subquadrate rather than subsemicircular maxillipede coxosternite (Fig. 16), with a straighter dental margin (Fig. 19). It is further distinguished from the North Island species P. (P.) harrisi by its larger number of maxillipede teeth (4 + 4 to 5 + 5 versus 2 + 2 or 3 + 3 in P. h a r r i s i), and fewer setae on the coxosternite of the second maxilla (Fig. 15), which is exceptionally setose in P. h a r r i s i (as many as 25 setae per coxa). The anterolateral part of the maxillipede coxosternum is also more setose in P. (P.) harrisi (Archey 1937: pl. 20, fig. 5; Edgecombe et al. 2002, fig. 3 H) than in P. (P.) rahuensis. Additional distinction from P. (P.) monteithi is made based on the anterior accessory claw being based on the dorsolateral side of the main claw in P. (P.) rahuensis (Fig. 22) versus a more ventrolateral base of the accessory claw in P. (P.) monteithi.
Published as part of Edgecombe, Gregory D., 2004, A new species of Paralamyctes (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from New Zealand, pp. 1-16 in Zootaxa 451 on pages 2-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.157323
{"references":["Enghoff, H. (1975) Notes on Lamyctes coeculus (Brolemann), a cosmopolitic, parthenogenetic centipede (Chilopoda: Henicopidae). Entomologica scandinavica, 6, 45 - 46.","Edgecombe, G. D. & Giribet, G. (2003 b) A new blind Lamyctes (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from Tasmania with an analysis of molecular sequence data for the Lamyctes - Henicops Group. Zootaxa, 152, 1 - 23.","Archey, G. (1922) Notes on New Zealand Chilopoda. Records of the Canterbury Museum, 2, 73 - 76.","Edgecombe, G. D. (2001) Revision of Paralamyctes (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Henicopidae), with six new species from eastern Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 53, 201 - 241.","Lawrence, R. F. (1960) Myriapoda: Chilopodes. Faune de Madagascar, 12. Publications de l'Institute de Recherche Scientifique, Tananarive-Tsimbazaza, pp. 1 - 122.","Edgecombe, G. D. (2003 c) A new genus of henicopid centipede (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from New Caledonia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 49, 269 - 284.","Edgecombe, G. D. (2004) The henicopid centipede Haasiella (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha): new species from Australia, with a morphology-based phylogeny of Henicopidae. Journal of Natural History, 38, 37 - 76.","Swofford, D. L. (2002) PAUP *. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Version 4.0 b 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.","Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Kallersjo, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A. G. (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics, 12, 99 - 124.","Bremer, K. (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10, 295 - 304.","Maddison, D. R. & Maddison, W. P. (2000) MacClade. Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.","Archey, G. (1937) Revision of the Chilopoda of New Zealand. Part 2. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum, 2, 71 - 100.","Edgecombe, G. D., Giribet, G. & Wheeler, W. C. (2002) Phylogeny of Henicopidae (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha): a combined analysis of morphology and five molecular loci. Systematic Entomology, 27, 31 - 64."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: