Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation
| Autor: | Christopher J. François, Eric Niespodzany, Kevin M. Johnson, Alex Frydrychowicz, Oliver Wieben, Scott B. Reeder |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Pulmonary Circulation Materials science Phase contrast microscopy Physics::Medical Physics Pulmonary Artery Sensitivity and Specificity Magnetic resonance angiography Article law.invention Young Adult Nuclear magnetic resonance law In vivo Image Interpretation Computer-Assisted medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Aorta Projection reconstruction Aged medicine.diagnostic_test Reproducibility of Results Magnetic resonance imaging General Medicine Blood flow Middle Aged Thorax Image Enhancement Radial velocity Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging Female Radiology Algorithms Blood Flow Velocity Magnetic Resonance Angiography |
| Zdroj: | Investigative radiology. 48(12) |
| ISSN: | 1536-0210 |
| Popis: | The objective of this study was to validate radially undersampled 5-point velocity-encoded time-resolved flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ("PC-VIPR", phase contrast vastly undersampled imaging with isotropic resolution projection reconstruction magnetic resonance) for the quantification of ascending aortic (AAO) and main pulmonary artery (MPA) flow in vivo.Data from 18 healthy volunteers (41.6 ± 16.2 years [range, 22-73 years]; body mass index, 26.0 ± 3.5 [19.1-31.4]) scanned at 3 T with a 32-channel coil were included. The left and right ventricular stroke volumes calculated from contiguous short-axis CINE-balanced steady state free precession (CINE-bSSFP) slices were used as the primary reference for cardiac output. Flow measured from 2-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2D-PC-MRI) in the AAO and the MPA served as the secondary reference. Time-resolved 4-dimensional flow-sensitive MRI (4D flow MRI) using PC-VIPR was performed with a velocity sensitivity of Venc = 150 cm/s reconstructed to 20 time frames at 1.4-mm isotropic spatial resolution. In 11 of 20 volunteers, phantom-corrected 4D flow MRI data were also assessed. Differences between methods of calculating the left ventricular and right ventricular cardiac output were assessed with the Bland-Altman analysis (BA, mean difference ±2SD). The QP/QS-ratio was calculated for each method.Initially, PC-VIPR compared unfavorably with CINE-bSSFP (left ventricular stroke volume: 96.5 ± 14.4 mL; right ventricular stroke volume: 93.6 ± 14.0 mL vs 81.2 ± 24.3 mL [AAO] and 85.6 ± 25.4 mL [MPA]; P = 0.027 and 0.25) with BA differences of -14.6 ± 44.0 mL (AAO) and -9.0 ± 45.9 mL (MPA). Whereas phantom correction had minor effects on 2D-PC-MRI results and comparison with CINE-bSSFP, it improved PC-VIPR results: BA differences between CINE-bSSFP and PC-VIPR after correction were -1.4 ± 15.3 mL (AAO) and -4.1 ± 16.1 mL (MPA); BA comparison with 2D-PC-MRI improved to -12.0 ± 48.1 mL (AAO) and -2.2 ± 19.5 mL (MPA). QP/QS-ratio results for all techniques were within physiologic limits.Accurate quantification of AAO and MPA flows with radially undersampled 4D flow MRI applying 5-point velocity encoding is achievable when phantom correction is used. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|