Tai Chi and Qigong Practices for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Autor: | Weihui Lu, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, Gianluigi Savarese, Zehuai Wen, Yiyi Cai, Xiankun Chen, Wei Jiang, Gaetano Marrone, Liuling Ma |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Article Subject medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology law.invention Other systems of medicine 03 medical and health sciences Walking distance 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Statistic Rehabilitation business.industry medicine.disease Confidence interval Complementary and alternative medicine Sample size determination Heart failure Meta-analysis Physical therapy business human activities RZ201-999 Research Article |
Zdroj: | Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol 2020 (2020) |
ISSN: | 1741-427X |
DOI: | 10.1155/2020/2034625 |
Popis: | Background. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the role of Tai Chi and Qigong Practices (TQPs) in managing chronic heart failure (CHF). They have included broad variations in comparators, sample sizes, and results. This study evaluates existing RCTs for evidence of TQPs rehabilitation effects for CHF. Methods. Both English and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to October 23, 2019. RCTs were included if they compared the addition of TQPs into routine managements (RMs) to RMs alone or compared TQPs to general exercise, with RMs as a consistent cointervention in both groups. Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned forms. RCT quality was assessed with the Cochrane tool. The primary outcomes were peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed with an I2 statistic. Results. A total of 33 RCTs with 2,465 patients were included in the systematic review. Compared to the RMs alone, TQPs plus RMs improved VO2peak (MD: 1.24 mL/kg/min, 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.57; I2 = 0%), 6MWD (MD: 59.63 meters, 95% CI, 43.35 to 75.90 I2 = 88%), and MLHFQ (MD: −8.63 scores; 95% CI, −10.60 to -6.67; I2 = 94%). Compared to general exercise, superior improvements were found in the TQP group; they were significant in MLHFQ (MD: −9.18 scores; 95% CI, −17.95 to −0.41; I2 = 86%), but not in VO2peak or 6MWD. Evidence was also found of TQPs’ safety and high adherence. Conclusions. Considering that there are low costs, multiple physical benefits, and no equipment required, TQPs are a promising rehabilitation therapy, as an adjunct to routine pharmacotherapies or as an alternative to conventional exercises, especially in home-based settings. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |