Evaluation of apically extruded debris during removal of gutta-percha and ResilonTM using different instrumentation techniques
| Autor: | Ankica Jakovljevic, Ana Nikitovic, Irena Melih, Veljko Kolak, Dragana Pesic |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
lcsh:R5-920
Materials science biology business.industry Instrumentation Significant difference Dentistry Gutta-percha gutta-percha biology.organism_classification Debris Lateral condensation root canal filling materials methods pit and fissure sealant Gutta Pharmacology (medical) Rotary instrumentation business lcsh:Medicine (General) Endodontic retreatment dental instruments |
| Zdroj: | Vojnosanitetski Pregled, Vol 75, Iss 1, Pp 56-61 (2018) |
| ISSN: | 2406-0720 0042-8450 |
| Popis: | Background/Aim. Apical extrusion of material is considered as one of the very important factor for endodontic treatment success. Microorganisms, necrotic tissue, filling material and irrigants, which can be extruded apically during endodontic retreatment, may jeopardize the success of the therapy. The aim of this in vitro study was to quantitatively evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment of teeth obturated with two different materials, using one hand and three rotary instrumentation techniques. Methods. Ninety-six extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and enlarged to size 40 using BioRaCe system, and then randomly divided into 8 groups of 12 specimens each. Half of the specimens were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus? sealer and another half with RealSeal SE system, using lateral condensation technique. Retreatment was performed using: Hedstr?m files; ProFile rotary files; ProTaper Retreatment system and D-RaCe system. Apically extruded debris was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes and evaluated using an electronic microbalance. Data were analyzed statistically using t-test and analysis of variance. Results. In the AH Plus/gutta-percha group, all tested rotary instruments gave significantly less extruded debris compared with Hedstr?m files (p < 0.05). In theRealSeal group, there was significant difference between DRaCe and Hedstr?m instruments (p < 0.05). Conclusion. All retreatment techniques resulted in apical extrusion. DRaCe system produced significantly less extruded debris compared to hand files. No significant difference was found when comparing two instruments specially designed for retreatment: D-RaCe and ProTaper systems. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|