Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Comparison to Laparoscopic Resection
| Autor: | Erin H. Baker, Patrick N. Salibi, Michael D Watson, David A. Iannitti, Christoph Tschuor, Dionisios Vrochides, Lee M. Ocuin, Keith Murphy, John B. Martinie, Maria Baimas-George |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Pancreatic disease Operative Time Adenocarcinoma Single Center Left pancreatectomy Pancreatectomy Robotic Surgical Procedures medicine Humans Robotic surgery Laparoscopic resection Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over business.industry General Medicine Perioperative Middle Aged medicine.disease Surgery Pancreatic Neoplasms Treatment Outcome Female Laparoscopy business |
| Zdroj: | The American Surgeon. 87:45-49 |
| ISSN: | 1555-9823 0003-1348 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0003134820949524 |
| Popis: | Background Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for pancreatic disease has been well demonstrated; however, there is scarce literature on long-term oncologic outcomes. We compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes between robotic left pancreatectomy (RLP) and laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (LLP) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods A retrospective review evaluated left pancreatectomies performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2009 to 2019 in a tertiary institution. Baseline characteristics, operative and oncologic outcomes were compared between RLP and LLP. Results There were 75 minimally invasive left pancreatectomy cases for pancreatic adenocarcinoma identified of which 33 cases were done robotically and 42 laparoscopically. Baseline characteristics demonstrated no difference in gender, age, BMI, T stage, N stage, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy. An analysis of operative variables demonstrated no difference in blood loss, increased duration, and higher lymph node yield with RLP (20 vs 12; P = .0029). Postoperatively, both cohorts had 30% pancreatic fistulas and no difference in complications. There were no differences in length of stay (LOS), 30- or 90-day readmission rates, or 90-day mortality. The analysis of oncologic outcomes demonstrated similar R0 resections (RLP: 72% vs OLP: 67%), recurrence rates (RLP: 36% vs OLP: 41%), and time to recurrence (RLP: 324 vs OLP 218 days). There was increased survival in the RLP cohort that was not significant (32 vs 19 months). Conclusion This analysis demonstrates RLP is at least equivalent to LLP in perioperative and oncologic outcomes. The significantly higher lymph node yield and trend toward an improved survival suggests oncologic advantage. Randomized controlled studies are needed to clarify benefit. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|