Deontological dilemma response tendencies and sensorimotor representations of harm to others

Autor: Leonardo Christov-Moore, Paul Conway, Marco Iacoboni
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Dissociation (neuropsychology)
Brain activity and meditation
Cognitive Neuroscience
media_common.quotation_subject
Empathy
lcsh:RC346-429
050105 experimental psychology
lcsh:RC321-571
neural resonance
03 medical and health sciences
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
moral dilemmas
0302 clinical medicine
process dissociation
Clinical Research
Moral psychology
medicine
Psychology
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
empathy
lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
media_common
Original Research
embodiment
medicine.diagnostic_test
05 social sciences
fMRI
Neurosciences
16. Peace & justice
moral judgment
Sensory Systems
humanities
Dilemma
Harm
Brain stimulation
Mental health
Cognitive Sciences
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Social psychology
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Neuroscience
Zdroj: Christov-Moore, L, Conway, P & Iacoboni, M 2017, ' Deontological dilemma response tendencies and sensorimotor representations of harm to others ', Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 11, 34 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2017.00034
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Christov-Moore, L; Conway, P; & Iacoboni, M. (2017). Deontological Dilemma Response Tendencies and Sensorimotor Representations of Harm to Others.. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 11, 34. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00034. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1z61k2sp
Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, vol 11
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Vol 11 (2017)
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00034
Popis: The dual process model of moral decision-making suggests that decisions to reject causing harm on moral dilemmas (where causing harm saves lives) reflect concern for others. Recently, some theorists have suggested such decisions actually reflect self-focused concern about causing harm, rather than witnessing others suffering. We examined brain activity while participants witnessed needles pierce another person’s hand, versus similar non-painful stimuli. More than a month later, participants completed moral dilemmas where causing harm either did or did not maximize outcomes. We employed process dissociation to independently assess harm-rejection (deontological) and outcome-maximization (utilitarian) response tendencies. Activity in the posterior inferior frontal cortex (pIFC) while participants witnessed others in pain predicted deontological, but not utilitarian, response tendencies. Previous brain stimulation studies have shown that the pIFC seems crucial for sensorimotor representations of observed harm. Hence, these findings suggest that deontological response tendencies reflect genuine other-oriented concern grounded in sensorimotor representations of harm.
Databáze: OpenAIRE