Network analysis reveals a distinct axis of macrophage activation in response to conflicting inflammatory cues
Autor: | Xiaji Liu, Anders R. Nelson, Jeffrey J. Saucerman, Angela C. Zeigler, Jingyuan Zhang, Merry L. Lindsey |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_treatment
Immunology Inflammation 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Article Mice 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Immunology and Allergy Macrophage Animals STAT3 Interleukin 4 030304 developmental biology Gene knockdown 0303 health sciences biology Chemistry Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 Wild type Models Immunological Macrophage Activation Phenotype Cell biology Crosstalk (biology) Cytokine Macrophages Peritoneal STAT protein biology.protein Cytokines Tumor necrosis factor alpha medicine.symptom Signal transduction 030215 immunology |
Zdroj: | J Immunol |
DOI: | 10.1101/844464 |
Popis: | Macrophages are subject to a wide range of cytokine and pathogen signals in vivo, which contribute to differential activation and modulation of inflammation. Understanding the response to multiple, often conflicting, cues that macrophages experience requires a network perspective. Here, we integrate data from literature curation and mRNA expression profiles to develop a large-scale computational model of the macrophage signaling network. In response to stimulation across all pairs of 9 cytokine inputs, the model predicted activation along the classic M1-M2 polarization axis but also a second axis of macrophage activation that distinguishes unstimulated macrophages from a mixed phenotype induced by conflicting cues. Along this second axis, combinations of conflicting stimuli, interleukin 4 (IL4) with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interferon-γ (IFNγ), IFNβ, or tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), produced mutual inhibition of several signaling pathways, e.g. nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), but also mutual activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) signaling module. In response to combined IFNγ and IL4, the model predicted genes whose expression was mutually inhibited, e.g. inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase 1 (Arg1), or mutually enhanced, e.g. IL4 receptor-α (IL4Rα) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), which was validated by independent experimental data. Knockdown simulations further predicted network mechanisms underlying functional crosstalk, such as mutual STAT3/STAT6-mediated enhancement of IL4Rα expression. In summary, the computational model predicts that network crosstalk mediates a broadened spectrum of macrophage activation in response to mixed pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine cues, making it useful for modeling in vivo scenarios.Summary sentenceNetwork modeling of macrophage activation predicts responses to combinations of cytokines along both the M1-M2 polarization axis and a second axis associated with a mixed macrophage activation phenotype. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |