Limitations of Fat-Free Mass for the Assessment of Muscle Mass in Obesity
Autor: | Markus Both, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Wiebke Braun, Kristin Klückmann, Bjørn Keller Jensen, Manfred J. Müller, Corinna Geisler |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Systematic error Male Sarcopenia Health (social science) 0302 clinical medicine Absorptiometry Photon Electric Impedance lcsh:RC620-627 Organ Size Middle Aged Plethysmography Fat-free mass lcsh:Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases Adipose Tissue Cardiology Body Composition Female Bioelectrical impedance analysis lcsh:Nutrition. Foods and food supply Four-compartment model Research Article Adult medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent 030209 endocrinology & metabolism lcsh:TX341-641 Composition analysis Muscle mass 03 medical and health sciences Skeletal muscle mass Young Adult Fat free mass Physiology (medical) Internal medicine medicine Humans Body Weights and Measures Obesity Muscle Skeletal Aged 030109 nutrition & dietetics business.industry Reproducibility of Results medicine.disease business human activities |
Zdroj: | Obesity Facts, Vol 12, Iss 3, Pp 307-315 (2019) |
Popis: | Background: A high amount of adipose tissue limits the accuracy of methods for body composition analysis in obesity. Objectives: The aim was to quantify and explain differences in fat-free mass (FFM) (as an index of skeletal muscle mass, SMM) measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), and deuterium dilution in comparison to multicompartment models, and to improve the results of BIA for obese subjects. Methods: In 175 healthy subjects (87 men and 88 women, BMI 20–43.3 kg/m2, 18–65 years), FFM measured by these methods was compared with results from a 3- (3C) and a 4-compartment (4C) model. FFM4C was compared with SMM measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Results: BIA and DXA overestimated and ADP underestimated FFM in comparison to 3C and 4C models with increasing BMI (all p < 0.001). Differences were largest for DXA. In obesity, BIA results were improved: valuecorrected = valueuncorrected – a(BMI – 30 kg/m2), a = 0.256 for FFM and a = 0.298 for SMM. SMM accounts for 45% of FFM in women and 49% in men. Conclusions: In obesity, the use of FFM is limited by a systematic error of reference methods. In addition, SMM accounts for about 50% of FFM only. Corrected measurement of SMM by BIA can overcome these drawbacks. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |