CyberKnife with integrated CT-on-rails: System description and first clinical application for pancreas SBRT
Autor: | Chrysi Papalazarou, Mischa S. Hoogeman, Vikas Gupta, Ben J.M. Heijmen, M. Milder, Joost J. Nuyttens, Gijsbert J. Klop, Johannes P. A. Marijnissen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Erasmus MC other, Radiotherapy |
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Scanner
business.industry Phantoms Imaging medicine.medical_treatment Implanted Fiducial General Medicine Robotics Radiosurgery Imaging phantom 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Acceptance testing Cyberknife Treatment plan 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Germany Medicine Humans Particle Accelerators business Nuclear medicine Tomography X-Ray Computed Image-guided radiation therapy |
Zdroj: | Medical Physics, 44(9), 4816-4827. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
ISSN: | 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
Popis: | Purpose This paper reports on the integration of a sliding-gantry CT-on-rails with a robotic linear accelerator. Methods The system consists of a SOMATOM Definition AS CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) and a CyberKnife M6 FIM (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Additional movement programs were implemented in the robotic treatment table (RoboCouch, Accuray Inc.) to move between CT and treatment position. Acceptance testing was performed on the CT scanner according to AAPM83 guidelines, as well as safety tests for collision avoidance and electromagnetic (EM) compatibility. For the first clinical application of the system, daily dose was evaluated in 5 pancreas SBRT patients. A second envisioned use is the optimal alignment of the treatment beams to soft-tissue targets without the use of implanted fiducials. To this end, an offset vector feature has been implemented, which shifts the treatment center according to the daily position of the tumor relative to the spine (established by a CT scan). This offset can be applied by either moving the treatment couch (physical couch shift) or by moving the CyberKnife robot (virtual couch shift). An End-to-End (E2E) test was specifically designed to evaluate the accuracy of this feature using the Xsight Lung Tracking Phantom (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA). The position of the tumor with respect to the spine was varied by moving the insert inside the phantom and a CT scan was made for each position. The treatment plan was subsequently delivered to the phantom employing spine tracking. The test was repeated four times for a physical couch shift and four times for a virtual couch shift. Results All acceptance, safety and EM compatibility testing was successful. For the first pancreas SBRT patients treated using daily CT imaging, the volume of stomach, duodenum, or small bowel receiving more than 35 Gy was found to increase or remain constant during treatment; however, the clinical constraint of 5 cc was not violated. For the offset vector E2E test, the reference accuracy (without any tumor shift) was (0.74, -0.61, -0.33) mm in the inferior, left, and anterior direction, respectively. The difference in deviation with respect to the reference was (-0.1±0.15, 0.01±0.16, -0.17±0.25) mm, when applying a physical couch shift. With a virtual couch shift, the deviations were (0.02±0.15, 0.06±0.23, -0.4±0.31) mm . Conclusions The first combination of a CyberKnife treatment unit with a sliding-gantry CT scanner is operational in our department enabling future developments toward image-guided online-adaptive SBRT supported by diagnostic-quality CT imaging. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |