Not all phylogenetic networks are leaf-reconstructible
Autor: | Leo van Iersel, Mark Jones, Péter L. Erdős |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
05C60 Isomorphism problems
05C60 Binary number Leaf removal 01 natural sciences Models Biological Article 010305 fluids & plasmas Set (abstract data type) Evolution Molecular 03 medical and health sciences Reticulate Phylogenetics 0103 physical sciences Phylogenetic Networks FOS: Mathematics Quantitative Biology::Populations and Evolution Mathematics - Combinatorics Relevance (information retrieval) Graph reconstruction Phylogeny 030304 developmental biology Mathematics 0303 health sciences Conjecture Phylogenetic tree Models Genetic 92D15 Problems related to evolution Applied Mathematics Mathematical Concepts Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) Biological Evolution Taxon Evolutionary biology Modeling and Simulation Undirected graphs Combinatorics (math.CO) Ulam’s Conjecture Algorithms |
Zdroj: | Journal of Mathematical Biology, 79(5) Journal of Mathematical Biology Journal of Mathematical Biology, 79, 1623-1638 |
ISSN: | 0303-6812 |
Popis: | Unrooted phylogenetic networks are graphs used to represent reticulate evolutionary relationships. Accurately reconstructing such networks is of great relevance for evolutionary biology. It has recently been conjectured that all unrooted phylogenetic networks for at least five taxa can be uniquely reconstructed from their subnetworks obtained by deleting a single taxon. Here, we show that this conjecture is false, by presenting a counter-example for each possible number of taxa that is at least 4. Moreover, we show that the conjecture is still false when restricted to binary networks. This means that, even if we are able to reconstruct the unrooted evolutionary history of each proper subset of some taxon set, this still does not give us enough information to reconstruct their full unrooted evolutionary history. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |