Left ventricular lead placement using inner guiding catheter alone in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
Autor: | Koji Sugiyama, Kento Yabe, Takeshi Sasaki, Masahiko Goya, Shu Yamashita, Ko Akimoto, Chisashi Toya, Tetsuo Sasano, Kazuto Hayasaka, Masahito Suzuki |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Male
Cardiac Catheterization medicine.medical_specialty Ventricular lead Heart Ventricles medicine.medical_treatment Perforation (oil well) Cardiac resynchronization therapy Prosthesis Implantation Lv dysfunction Humans Medicine Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices Coronary sinus Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Surgery Heart failure Feasibility Studies Guiding catheter Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Subclavian vein |
Zdroj: | Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 44:1331-1339 |
ISSN: | 1540-8159 0147-8389 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pace.14307 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND Subselection inner catheters (Inner-Cath) are used adjunctively with outer guiding catheters (Outer-Cath) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of left ventricular lead placement (LV-LP) guided by Inner-Cath alone. METHODS A total of 74 patients undergoing de novo CRT implantation were investigated. LV-LP was initially guided by Inner-Cath in 42 patients (Inner-Cath group) and Outer-Cath in 32 patients (Outer-Cath group). In the Inner-Cath group, a 7Fr Inner-Cath was advanced to the coronary sinus through a 7 Fr sheath inserted in a subclavian vein. In the Outer-Cath group, 9Fr or 10Fr Outer-Caths were used. Success rate of LV-LP, additional use of inner or outer catheters and procedure-related complications were compared between groups. RESULTS LV-LP was successful in all patients in the Inner-Cath group, while LV-LP had to be abandoned in two patients (6.3%) of the Outer-Cath group due to CS perforation caused by Outer-Cath manipulation. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the Inner-Cath group (148 vs. 168 min; p = .024). Deployment of both an inner and outer cath became necessary less frequently for the Inner-Cath group (4.8% vs. 56.3%; p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |