Third‐Party Intervention in Peer Victimization: Self‐Evaluative Emotions and Appraisals of a Diverse Adolescent Sample
Autor: | Zoe Higheagle Strong, Karin S. Frey, Brendan R. Eagan, Cynthia R. Pearson, Adaurennaya C. Onyewuenyi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Cultural Studies Self-Assessment Pride Adolescent media_common.quotation_subject Emotions Poison control Shame 050109 social psychology Anger Suicide prevention Peer Group Behavioral Neuroscience Intervention (counseling) Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Crime Victims media_common Negotiating 05 social sciences Bullying Prosocial behavior Peer victimization Female Psychology Social psychology Social Sciences (miscellaneous) 050104 developmental & child psychology |
Zdroj: | Journal of Research on Adolescence. 30:633-650 |
ISSN: | 1532-7795 1050-8392 |
Popis: | African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 270) described how they felt and appraised their own actions in response to a peer's victimization. Analyses compared times they had calmed victim emotions, amplified anger, avenged, and resolved conflicts peacefully. Adolescents felt prouder, more helpful, more like a good friend, and expected more peer approval after calming and resolving than after amplifying anger or avenging peers. They also felt less guilt and shame after calming and resolving. Avenging elicited more positive self-evaluation than amplifying. Epistemic network analyses explored links between self-evaluative and other emotions. Pride was linked to relief after efforts to calm or resolve. Third-party revenge reflected its antisocial and prosocial nature with connections between pride, relief, anger, and guilt. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |