Evidence That Emmetropization Buffers Against Both Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia

Autor: Kate Northstone, Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad, J. Willem L. Tideman, Caroline C W Klaver, Annechien E. G. Haarman, Jeremy A. Guggenheim, Alfred Pozarickij, Clair A. Enthoven, Jan Roelof Polling, Milly S. Tedja, Denis Plotnikov, Cathy Williams
Přispěvatelé: Erasmus MC other, Ophthalmology, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Epidemiology
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Male
Refractive error
Longitudinal study
genetic epidemiology
Adolescent
Sensory disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 12]
03 medical and health sciences
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center
0302 clinical medicine
Risk Factors
medicine
Myopia
Humans
Genetic epidemiology
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
030212 general & internal medicine
refractive error
Longitudinal Studies
Risk factor
Gene–environment interaction
Child
Generation R
business.industry
Clinical and Epidemiologic Research
Regression analysis
ALSPAC
medicine.disease
Emmetropia
Refractive Errors
Quantile regression
030221 ophthalmology & optometry
Regression Analysis
Female
Gene-Environment Interaction
business
Bristol Population Health Science Institute
Demography
Quantile
Zdroj: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 61
Pozarickij, A, Enthoven, C A, Ghorbani Mojarrad, N, Plotnikov, D, Tedja, M S, Haarman, A E G, Tideman, J W L, Polling, J R, Northstone, K, Williams, C, Klaver, C C W & Guggenheim, J A 2020, ' Evidence That Emmetropization Buffers Against Both Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia ', Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 61, no. 2 . https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.2.41
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 61(2):Unsp 41. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 61, 2
ISSN: 1552-5783
0146-0404
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.2.41
Popis: Purpose: To test the hypothesis that emmetropization buffers against genetic and environmental risk factors for myopia by investigating whether risk factor effect sizes vary depending on children's position in the refractive error distribution.Methods: Refractive error was assessed in participants from two birth cohorts: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (noncycloplegic autorefraction) and Generation R (cycloplegic autorefraction). A genetic risk score for myopia was calculated from genotypes at 146 loci. Time spent reading, time outdoors, and parental myopia were ascertained from parent-completed questionnaires. Risk factors were coded as binary variables (0 = low, 1 = high risk). Associations between refractive error and each risk factor were estimated using either ordinary least squares (OLS) regression or quantile regression.Results: Quantile regression: effects associated with all risk factors (genetic risk, parental myopia, high time spent reading, low time outdoors) were larger for children in the extremes of the refractive error distribution than for emmetropes and low ametropes in the center of the distribution. For example, the effect associated with having a myopic parent for children in quantile 0.05 vs. 0.50 was as follows: ALSPAC: age 15, -1.19 D (95% CI -1.75 to -0.63) vs. -0.13 D (-0.19 to -0.06), P = 0.001; Generation R: age 9, -1.31 D (-1.80 to -0.82) vs. -0.19 D (-0.26 to -0.11), P < 0.001. Effect sizes for OLS regression were intermediate to those for quantiles 0.05 and 0.50.Conclusions: Risk factors for myopia were associated with much larger effects in children in the extremes of the refractive error distribution, providing indirect evidence that emmetropization buffers against both genetic and environmental risk factors.
Databáze: OpenAIRE