Evaluation of the Use of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: International Survey
| Autor: | Rubén Trigueros, Luciano Mignini, Manuel Martín-Díaz, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Khalid S. Khan, Marta Maes-Carballo |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | [Maes-Carballo,M] Unidad de Patología Mamaria del Servicio de Cirugía General, Complexo Universitario Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain. [Maes-Carballo,M, Khan,KS, Bueno-Cavanillas,A] Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. [Martín-Díaz,M] Hospital Básico Santa Ana de Motril, Granada, Spain. [Mignini,L] Unidad de Mastología del Grupo Oroño, Rosario, Argentina. [Khan,KS, Bueno-Cavanillas,A] CIBER of Epidimiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. [Trigueros,R] Department of Language and Education, University of Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain. [Bueno-Cavanillas,A] Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBS), Granada, Spain. |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Longitudinal study
Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis use of shared decision making lcsh:Medicine Computer-assisted web interviewing Psychiatry and Psychology::Psychological Phenomena and Processes::Mental Processes::Thinking::Decision Making [Medical Subject Headings] Estudios longitudinales Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Chordata::Vertebrates::Mammals::Primates::Haplorhini::Catarrhini::Hominidae::Humans [Medical Subject Headings] 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer Surveys and Questionnaires 030212 general & internal medicine Survey health care economics and organizations Shared decision making Health Care::Health Care Facilities Manpower and Services::Health Services::Community Health Services::Consumer Participation::Patient Participation [Medical Subject Headings] longitudinal study humanities Analytical Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Epidemiologic Study Characteristics as Topic::Epidemiologic Studies::Cross-Sectional Studies [Medical Subject Headings] Encuestas y cuestionarios 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Scale (social sciences) Neoplasias de la mama Professional association Psychology medicine.medical_specialty education shared decision making Decision Making Breast Neoplasms Article Information Science::Information Science::Data Collection::Questionnaires [Medical Subject Headings] 03 medical and health sciences breast cancer Patient satisfaction Toma de decisiones conjunta Analytical Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Epidemiologic Study Characteristics as Topic::Epidemiologic Studies::Cohort Studies::Longitudinal Studies [Medical Subject Headings] medicine Humans survey Use of shared decision making Disadvantage Diseases::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Breast Neoplasms [Medical Subject Headings] Toma de decisiones compartidas lcsh:R Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health International survey medicine.disease Cross-Sectional Studies Family medicine Patient Participation Decision Making Shared |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 2128, p 2128 (2021) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Volume 18 Issue 4 Digibug: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada Universidad de Granada (UGR) Digibug. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Granada instname |
| Popis: | Objectives: To assess shared decision-making (SDM) knowledge, attitude and application among health professionals involved in breast cancer (BC) treatment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire, sent by several professional societies to health professionals involved in BC management. There were 26 questions which combined demographic and professional data with some items measured on a Likert-type scale. Results: The participation (459/541 84.84%) and completion (443/459 96.51%) rates were high. Participants strongly agreed or agreed in 69.57% (16/23) of their responses. The majority stated that they knew of SDM (mean 4.43 (4.36–4.55)) and were in favour of its implementation (mean 4.58 (4.51–4.64)). They highlighted that SDM practice was not adequate due to lack of resources (3.46 (3.37–3.55)) and agreed on policies that improved its implementation (3.96 (3.88–4.04)). The main advantage of SDM for participants was patient satisfaction (38%), and the main disadvantage was the patients’ paucity of knowledge to understand their disease (24%). The main obstacle indicated was the lack of time and resources (40%). Conclusions: New policies must be designed for adequate training of professionals in integrating SDM in clinical practice, preparing them to use SDM with adequate resources and time provided. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|