Nothoodes angustatus Guéorguiev & Liang 2020, comb. n

Autor: Guéorguiev, Borislav, Liang, Hongbin
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4480046
Popis: 20. Nothoodes angustatus (Lorenz, 1998), comb. n. (Figs 27 A–G, Figs 28 A–F, Table 5) Oodes angustatus Lorenz, 1998: 305 (replacement name for Oodes parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1851, nec Oodes parallelus Say, 1830). = Oodes parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1851: 271 (type locality: ‘ India bor.’). The name is a junior primary homonym of Oodes parallelus Say, 1830, and a senior primary homonym of Oodes parallelus Motschulsky, 1858. References. Oodes parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère: Gemminger & Harold 1868: 232; Chaudoir 1882: 347–348 (re-description and localities: ‘Hindostan… Deccan… Malacca’); Bates 1892: 323 (similarity with O. cribristernis); Andrewes 1923: 232 (morphology); Andrewes 1924: 589 (morphology); Andrewes 1928: 170 (distribution in Sri Lanka); Andrewes 1930: 238 (‘Khasi Hills. Saidpur. Dacca. North Kanara. Ceylon: Mamaduwa, Anuradhapura, Hora- wupotana, Rangoon, Palon, Tharrawaddy. Malacca.’); Andrewes 1940: 203 (morphology), 204 (identification key; distribution: ‘ India, Ceylon [Sri Lanka], Burma [Myanmar], Malacca’), 205 (comparison with O. longus); Ali 1967: 17 (comparison with O. basrensis Ali, 1967); Saha & Halder 2000:4, 19 (distribution: India). ? Oodes indicus (nomen nudum): Chaudoir 1882: 362. ? Oodes parallelus LaFerté- Sénectère: Bates 1892: 323 (distribution in Myanmar: ‘Palon, Pegu’). Oodes (Oodes) parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère: Csiki 1931: 1010 (‘Brit. Indien, Ceylon, Birma, Malacca’). Oodes angustatus: Lorenz 2005: 325. Type material. Oodes parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère (see Chaudoir 1882: 348): holotype ♀, ‘Ex Musaeo Chaudoir [w, red print] // parallelus Laferté Indes orient Laferté. [handwritten label pinned on bottom of box]’ ((MNHN, box ‘Collection Chaudoir Carabidae (Lonchost.) (Oodes) Prionognat. Hololius Holcocoleus Sphaerodes Simous Melanodes’)). Type material. Oodes longus Andrewes: paratype ♂, ‘Pusa Bihar Peries coll [w, p] // Co-type [white rounded label with green band, p] // Oodes longus cotype Andr. H.E.Andrewes det. [w, h/p] // H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945– 97. [w, p]’ (BMNH). This specimen was part of the type series of O. longus. However, examination proved that it belongs to N. angustatus Lorenz, and not to N. longus Andrewes. Other material examined. Imprecise localities: 1♀, ‘Bengal May 1809. // Mus. Westerm.’ (ZMUC); 1♀, ‘Bengal Wallich’ (ZMUC); 1♀, ‘Bengala. Mundt’ (ZMUC); 1♀, ‘Bengala. Mus. Calsm.’ (ZMUC); 1♂, ‘Bengale Jungle de Mohrbunj R.P. H. Gengler’ (MNHN). NEPAL: Province No. 5: 2♂♂, 1♀, ‘ Nepal Lumbini Zone Siddharthanagar (= Bhairawa), 4.VII.1981, leg. P. Beron’ (NMNHS); 1♂, 3♀♀, ‘ NEPAL Lumbini Bhairahawa [Siddharthanagar], 9.X.1984 leg. P. Beron’ (NMNHS); 1♀, ‘ NEPAL, P: Bheri D: Banke, Nepalgunj Hotel Shena, 140mNN 14./ 15.VI.2007, LF 28°02’41”N, 81°37’17”E leg. M. Hartmann’ (NME); 1♀, ‘ NEPAL, Prov. Bheri D: Banke, Nepalganj Hotel Kitchen Hut // 140m NN, N28°04’97” E81°38’56”, on light 23.–25.VI.2011 leg. M. Hartmann #02’ (NME); 1♀, ‘ NEPAL Bheri Zone 8 km NE Nepalgunj 28°05’N 81°40’E, alt. 155 m lgt. Fouqué René, 19.IX.2015 ’ (cPB). INDIA: Imprecise localities: 1♀, ‘ Oodes India (Deccan) // India or. (Deccan) coll. Castelnau // indicus Chaud. // Oodes indicus Chaud. det., Chaudoir 1882 // Museo Genova coll. Castelnau // sp. citata da Chaudoir 1882 a pag. 362 ma sembra che non ia mai stara descritta R.P. [by Roberto Poggi]’ (MCSN); 1♀, ‘Deccan.’ ((MNHN, box ‘Collection Chaudoir Carabidae (Lonchost.) (Oodes) Prionognat. Hololius Holcocoleus Sphaerodes Simous Melanodes’)); 1♂, 3♀♀, ‘India’ (BMNH); 1♀, ‘Coromandel M. Maindron // Genji 25 août 15 sept. 1901’ (MNHN, box ‘Collection Générale Oodes ’). B i h a r State: 1♀, ‘Dinapoor // Ex Musaeo Mniszech’ ((MNHN, box ‘Collection Chaudoir Carabidae (Lonchost.) (Oodes) Prionognat. Hololius Holcocoleus Sphaerodes Simous Melanodes’)). Andhra Pradesh State: 1♂, 1♀, ‘ 2010–XI–30 INDIA, Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, Naidupet mandal, Dwarakapuram vill. Chen C.C. lgt.’ (IZAS). Karnataka State: 1♀, ‘Kanara.’ (MNHN); 1♂, 2♀♀, ‘N. Kanara Bombay T.R.D. Bell’ (MNHN, box ‘ Oodini Chlaeniini, Abacetini & others det. by H.E. Andrewes’; BMNH); 1♂, 3♀♀, ‘ Inde (Bellary) Chaper 1883’ (MNHN, box ‘Collection Générale Oodes ’). SRI LANKA: North Central Province: 1♂, ‘Anuradhapura Ceylon W. Horn 1899 // Collection P. Dupuis’ (RBINS). Western Province: 1♂, ‘Horawupotana Ceylon. India 13–X–24’ (BMNH). MYANMAR: Bago Region: 1♀, ‘Palon (Pegù) L. Fea VIII.IX.87 // Oodes parallelus Laf.?’ (MCSN); 1♀, ‘Tharrawaddy, Burma. G.Q.Corbet. // Oodes parallelus Laf. Compared with type H.E.A.’ (BMNH). Ay e y a r w a d y Region: 2♀♀, ’ 19–31. V. 2001 BURMA (MYANMAR) RANGOON—TAIKKYI NYAUNGGON KLÍCHA M. Lgt’ (cDW). Yangon Region: 1♀, ‘ BURMA, Rangoon. F.J. Meggitt.’ (BMNH). TME: 40 specimens. TGE: 2♂♂, 1♀. Diagnosis. This species is easily differentiated from its congeners by its large size, 15 mm or more, the specific form of the median lobe (Figs 28A, B, C, D), and W/Lp2>1.5. Description. Habitus. Large-sized specimens (BL: 15.1–16.6 mm, BW: 5.65–6.70 mm), with elongate and moderately convex body (Figs 27A, G). Ratios and measurements. See Table 5. Color and luster. Body dorsally black, ventrally dark brown to black, surface markedly shiny, without iridescence. Antennomere 1 and medial parts of antennomeres 2 and 3 piceous, marginal part of last two antennomeres and 4–11 fulvous to rufous. Palpi rufopiceous with extremities paler. Legs rufous to rufopiceous. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctuation; proepisternum with dense and shallow punctures, meso- and metepisternum, sides of metasternum and ventrite 1 at base with dense and coarse punctures; abdominal ventrites more or less punctured and wrinkled at sides. Head. Relatively large, more than half the width of pronotum (Table 5). Mentum tooth rounded apically, with distinct paramedial border (Fig. 27B). Thorax. Pronotum with sides slightly rounded toward posterior angles; maximum width very close to posterior angles; disc without laterobasal impressions; base moderately sinuate. Prosternum with deep median longitudinal sulcus; prosternal process subelongate, bordered laterally and subapically, unbordered at apex (Fig. 27D). Metepisternum elongate (MA/ MM: 0.84–0.91), its coadunation with epipleuron short, located anteriorly (Fig. 27E). Elytra. Apical sinuation slightly distinct. Basal margin distinct laterally, forming a minute denticle at shoulder, disappearing medially at level between striae 2 and 3.Granulation in marginal furrow continuous. Parascutellar striola well developed, long, finely punctate; striae 1–6 less impressed than stria 7. Intervals 1–7 rather flat, interval 8 moderately convex. Legs. Male mesotibia with a swelling in apical two-thirds. Protarsomeres 1–3 of male strongly dilated (W/Lp2: 1.55–1.76). Male genitalia. Median lobe (Figs 28A, B, C, D) with basal bulb long, cylindrical, and moderately open dorsally; angle between basal bulb and shaft nearly right; shaft swollen anteriorly (lateral view); apex curved ventrally; apical lamella straight, wide, subtriangular, rounded at tip; ostium long, nearly reaching basal bulb; internal sac with a smaller proximal sclerite situated in medial third and a large, compound distal one in apical half. Female genitalia. Apical gonocoxite stout, sub-triangular, with dorsomedial ensiform seta located equidistant from base and middle and nematiform setae removed from apex (Fig. 28E). Bursa copulatrix subconical; spermathecal gland connected at apex of seminal canal (Fig. 28F). Distribution. Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar,? Malaysia (‘Malacca’). According to Andrewes (1930) and Saha & Halder (2000), the species occurs in the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Meghalaya (Khasi Hills), and Karnataka. The record for ‘Malacca’ (Chaudoir 1882; Andrewes 1930, 1940; Csiki 1931) is highly doubtful (see “Notes”). First record for Nepal. Bionomics. Nothing is known about the bionomics of N. angustatus. Notes. Specimen cited as [Oodes] indicus by Chaudoir (1882) has been examined and found to belong to N. angustatus (see “Material examined”). The name Oodes indicus is a nomen nudum. We have also studied the material published as ‘? Oodes parallelus ’ by Bates (1892: 323). It is a female specimen representing the species dealt with here. Most likely the citation of the female specimen identified as “ Oodes parallelus LaFerté-Sénectère ” from ‘Malacca’ (Chaudoir 1882: 348) refers to the holotype of Oodes subcoriaceus Chaudoir, 1882. Two specimens collected near Dwarakapuram Village, Andhra Pradesh, India, were collected together with a paratype of O. bharat indicating that the two Nothoodes species live together. 21. Nothoodes bharat sp. n. (Figs 29 A–G, Figs 30 A–G, Table 5) Type material. Holotype ♂, ‘ 2014–VIII–15 INDIA, Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, Naidupet mandal, Dwarakapuram vill. Chen C.C. lgt. [w, p]’ (IZAS). Paratypes, one male and two females, labelled as follows: 1♂, ‘ 2011–III–1 INDIA, Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, Naidupet mandal, Dwarakapuram vill. Chen C.C. lgt. [w, p]’ (NMNHS); 1♀, ‘ 2010–XI–30 INDIA, Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, Naidupet mandal, Dwarakapuram vill. Chen C.C. lgt. [w, p]’ (IZAS); 1♀, ‘Bangalore Chikkangalur [Chikmagalur] Tabourel 1900 [w, p]’ (MNHN). TME: 4 specimens. TGE: 1♂, 2♀♀. Diagnosis. This species is readily distinguished from other Nothoodes species, except N. angustatus, by its lower PW /HW and PW /PA (Table 5). It differs from the latter species in its small size, less than 14 mm. Description. Habitus. Rather large specimens (BL: 13.1–13.6 mm, BW: 4.95–5.40 mm), with subelongate and slightly convex body (Figs 29A, E). Ratios and measurements. See Table 5. Color and luster. Body black dorsally and ventrally; antennae, palpi, tibiae and tarsi rufopiceous. Integument dorsally and ventrally shiny, without iridescence. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctuation (sometimes posterolateral parts of pronotum with large, shallow punctures extending laterally in posterior half); proepisternum with dense and shallow punctures, sides of pro- and metasternum, and meso- and metepisternum with dense and coarse punctures; abdominal ventrites 1–5 punctate at base and at sides, ventrite 6 punctate at apex. Head. Relatively large, more than half width of pronotum (Table 5). Mentum tooth with apex broadly rounded, with distinct paramedial border (Fig. 29C). Thorax. Pronotum (Fig. 29B) with sides weakly rounded toward posterior angles; maximum width in posterior third; laterobasal impressions small but distinct; base moderately sinuate. Prosternum with indistinct median longitudinal sulcus; prosternal process subelongate, bordered subapically, bordered or not at apex (Fig. 29F). Metepisternum longer than wide (MA/ MM: 0.88–0.92), punctuation less dense and coarser than in N. angustatus, its coadunation with epipleuron long, located anteriorly (Fig. 29G). Elytra. Apical sinuation weak. Basal margin distinct laterally, forming a minute denticle at shoulder, disappearing medially at level of stria 3. Granulation in marginal furrow continuous. Parascutellar striola punctate; striae distinctly punctate on anterior two-thirds. Intervals 1–7 subconvex, interval 8 more convex than others. Legs. Male mesotibia with a swelling in apical half. Protarsomeres 1–3 of male (Fig. 29D) moderately dilated, with second segment slightly wider than long (W/Lp2: 1.15–1.23). Male genitalia. Median lobe (Figs 30A, B, C, D) arcuate laterally, with basal bulb reduced at base, widely open dorsally; angle between basal bulb and shaft obtuse; shaft long, broad, curved ventrally; apex straight, tapered; apical lamella directed to left, narrowed distally, ending with round disc broadened on left; ostium nearly reaching basal bulb; internal sac with small, U-shaped proximal sclerite and larger, less strongly chitinized distal sclerite. Female genitalia. Apical gonocoxite elongate, with dorsomedial ensiform seta near middle and nematiform setae near apex (Fig. 30E). Bursa copulatrix globe-shaped; spermathecal gland connected near apex of seminal canal (Figs 30F, G). Etymology. The name Bharat [Bhârat] is a native Indian word that designate both the Indian subcontinent and the Republic of India; it is mentioned in Indian epic poetry and the constitution of the country. Distribution. Oriental region: India (Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh). Bionomics. This species was collected at light trap in the dry monsoon season. No pond or river nearby was observed at the time of collecting. Notes. Hind trochanters of the female paratype from Andhra Pradesh bear setiferous punctures (Fig. 29G). This unique feature is first registered for the Oodini and may be regarded as an atavism. See also “Notes” under Nothoodes angustatus. 22. Nothoodes longus (Andrewes, 1940), comb. n. (Figs 31 A–J, Table 5) Oodes longus Andrewes, 1940: 205 (type locality: ‘Brahmaputra River Goalundo–Gauhati’ [Brahmaputra River between the town of Goalundo Ghat, Bangladesh and the city of Gawahati, India]. References. Oodes longus: Andrewes 1940: 204 (identification key; distribution: ‘N.E. India’); Ali 1967: 17 (comparison with O. basrensis Ali, 1967); Lorenz 1998: 305; Lorenz 2005: 325. Type material. Oodes longus Andrewes: holotype ♂, ‘Type [white rounded label with red band, p] // Brahmaputra River Goalundo–Gauhati July 1919 Fletcher coll [w, p] // Oodes longus Andr. Type H.E.Andrewes det. [w, h/p]’ (BMNH). Paratypes, one male and two females, labelled as follows: 1♂, ‘Para-type [white rounded label with yellow band, p] // Brahmaputra River Goalundo–Gauhati July 1919 Fletcher coll [w, p] // Oodes longus And. Paratype [w, h]’ (MNHN, box ‘ Oodini Chlaeniini, Abacetini & others det. by H.E. Andrewes’); 1♀, ‘Brahmaputra River Goalundo–Gauhati July 1919 Fletcher coll [w, p] // Co-type [white rounded label with green band, p] // Oodes longus cotype Andr. H.E.Andrewes det. [w, h/p] // H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945–97. [w, p]’ (BMNH); 1♀, ‘Brahmaputra River Goalundo–Gauhati July 1919 Fletcher coll [w, p] // Co-type [white rounded label with green band, p] // H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945–97. [w, p]’ (BMNH). Other material examined. INDIA: A s s a m State: 2♂♂, ‘ INDIA (Assam State Dibrugarh distr.) Dibrugarh (at light) 2.–3.VI.2006 Guillaume de Rougemont’ (NMNHS, cDW). ? MYANMAR: Tanintharyi Region: 1♂, ‘Tenasserim. Papun. Adamson’s Coll. 1908–102.’ [specimen determined as variation of O. longus by H.E. Andrewes] (BMNH). TME: 7 specimens. TGE: 3♂♂. Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other Nothoodes species by its less impressed elytral striae (more perceptible in anterior half of elytra). It is further separated from other congeners, except N. taprobanae, by its greater PW /HW and lower EW/ PW (Table 5). Nothoodes longus is easily separated from N. taprobanae by its larger size, 13 mm or more. Description (based on male sex). Habitus. Moderately large specimens (BL: 13.0– 13.6 mm, BW: 5.1–5.2 mm), with subelongate and convex body (Figs 31A, I). Ratios and measurements. See Table 5. Color and luster. Body black dorsally and ventrally; antennae, palpi, and tarsomeres rufous to rufopiceous. Integument markedly shiny; dorsal surface with greenish hue, ventral surface without iridescence. Punctuation. Dorsal surface without punctures except posterolateral parts of pronotum with large and shallow punctures extending laterally to posterior half; sides of prosternum and proepisternum, abdominal ventrites 1–5 at base and at sides, and ventrite 6 at apex with dense and shallow punctures; meso- and metepisternum, and sides of metasternum with dense and coarse punctures. Head. About half as wide as pronotum (Table 5). Mentum tooth widely rounded (specimens from Tenasserim) to truncate (paratype) apically, with distinct paramedial border (Fig. 31B). Thorax. Pronotum (Fig. 31J) with sides weakly rounded toward posterior angles; maximum width close to posterior angles; laterobasal impressions subtle; base moderately sinuate. Prosternum without or with indistinct median longitudinal sulcus; prosternal process subelongate, bordered subapically, unbordered at base and at apex (Fig. 31C). Metepisternum longer than wide (MA/ MM: 0.84–0.88), its coadunation with epipleuron short, located anteriorly (Fig. 31D). Elytra. Apical sinuation distinct but weak. Basal margin distinct laterally, forming a small denticle at shoulder, decreasing medially and disappearing at level between striae 2 and 3. Granulation in marginal furrow continuous. Parascutellar striola and striae 1–4 rather shallow (shallower than in N. taprobanae); striola and striae in anterior half punctured. Intervals 1–7 flat, interval 8 moderately convex. Legs. Male mesotibia with a swelling in apical half. Protarsomeres 1–3 of male moderately dilated, with second tarso
Published as part of Guéorguiev, Borislav & Liang, Hongbin, 2020, Revision of the Palaearctic and Oriental representatives of Lachnocrepis LeConte and Oodes Bonelli (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with special account on Chinese species, pp. 1-89 in Zootaxa 4850 (1) on pages 69-78, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4850.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4407072
{"references":["Lorenz, W. (1998) Systematic list of extant ground beetles of the world (Insecta Coleoptera \" Geadephaga \": Trachypachidae and Carabidae incl. Paussinae, Cicindelinae, Rhysodinae). 1 st Edition. Published by the Author, Tutzing, [ii] + 502 pp.","LaFerte-Senectere, F. T. de (1851) Revision de la tribu des patellimanes de Dejean, coleopteres pentameres de la famille des carabiques. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Deuxieme Serie, 9, 209 - 294.","Motschulsky, V. de (1858) Litterature. Etudes Entomologiques, 7, 171 - 178.","Gemminger, M. & Harold, E. von (1868) Catalogus coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Tom. I. Cicindelidae-Carabidae. E. H. Gummi, Monachii, xxxvi + 424 + [8] pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 9089","Chaudoir, M. de (1882) Monographie des oodides 1 re partie. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, Series 6, 2, 317 - 378.","Bates, H. W. (1892) Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. XLIV. List of the Carabidae. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 32, 267 - 428.","Andrewes, H. E. (1923) Descriptions of some new Carabidae from Ceylon. (Part I.). Spolia Zeylanica, 12, 223 - 251.","Andrewes, H. E. (1924) Papers on Oriental Carabidae. - XIV. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 9, 14, 585 - 593. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222932408633166","Andrewes, H. E. (1928) A Catalogue of the Carabidae of Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica, 14 (2), 135 - 195.","Andrewes, H. E. (1930) Catalogue of Indian insects. 18. Carabidae. Government of India Central Publication Branch, Calcutta, 389 pp.","Andrewes, H. E. (1940) Keys to some Indian genera of Carabidae (Col.). X. The genus Oodes. The Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Series B, 9, 203 - 208. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 3113.1940. tb 00329. x","Ali, H. A. (1967) New species of Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Iraq. Bulletin of the Biological Research Centre, University of Baghdad, 1, 12 - 29.","Saha, S. K. & Halder, S. K. (2000) Insecta: Coleoptera: Adephaga: Carabidae. In: Zoological Survey of India, State Fauna. Series 4. Fauna of Meghalaya. Part 5. Insecta. Government of India, Calcutta, pp. 1 - 40.","Csiki, E. (1931) Carabidae: Harpalinae V. In: Junk, W. & Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Pars 115. W. Junk, Berlin, pp. 739 - 1022.","Lorenz, W. (2005) Systematic list of extant ground beetles of the world (Coleoptera \" Geadephaga \": Trachypachidae and Carabidae incl. Paussinae, Cicindelinae, Rhysodinae). 2 nd Edition. Published by the author, Tutzing, [ii] + 530 pp."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: