Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study
| Autor: | Perla Marang-van de Mheen, Wilbert B. Van den Hout, Stefanie Hofstede, Leti Van Bodegom-Vos, Thea Vliet Vlieland, Anne Stiggelbout, Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp, Willem Assendelft |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Patients Lumbar radicular syndrome Health Personnel education Decision Making MEDLINE Health Informatics Health informatics Health administration Sciatica Nursing Multidisciplinary approach Humans Medicine Providers Qualitative Research Health policy Shared decision making Aged Netherlands Medicine(all) Multidisciplinary Implementation strategy business.industry Barriers and facilitators Research Health Policy Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Health services research General Medicine Focus Groups Middle Aged Professionals Focus group Female Interdisciplinary Communication Sciatic Neuropathy business Qualitative research |
| Zdroj: | Implementation Science, 8 Implementation Science : IS |
| Popis: | Background The Dutch multidisciplinary sciatica guideline recommends that the team of professionals involved in sciatica care and the patient together decide on surgical or prolonged conservative treatment (shared decision making [SDM]). Despite this recommendation, SDM is not yet integrated in sciatica care. Existing literature concerning barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation mainly focuses on one discipline only, whereas multidisciplinary care may involve other barriers and facilitators, or make these more complex for both professionals and patients. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by patients and professionals for SDM implementation in multidisciplinary sciatica care. Methods We conducted 40 semi-structured interviews with professionals involved in sciatica care (general practitioners, physical therapists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic surgeons) and three focus groups among patients (six to eight per group). The interviews and focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed in full. Reported barriers and facilitators were classified according to the framework of Grol and Wensing. The software package Atlas.ti 7.0 was used for analysis. Results Professionals reported 53 barriers and 5 facilitators, and patients 35 barriers and 18 facilitators for SDM in sciatica care. Professionals perceived most barriers at the level of the organizational context, and facilitators at the level of the individual professional. Patients reported most barriers and facilitators at the level of the individual professional. Several barriers and facilitators correspond with barriers and facilitators found in the literature (e.g., lack of time, motivation) but also new barriers and facilitators were identified. Many of these new barriers mentioned by both professionals and patients were related to the multidisciplinary setting, such as lack of visibility, lack of trust in expertise of other disciplines, and lack of communication between disciplines. Conclusions This study identified barriers and facilitators for SDM in the multidisciplinary sciatica setting, by both professionals and patients. It is clear that more barriers than facilitators are perceived for implementation of SDM in sciatica care. Newly identified barriers and facilitators are related to the multidisciplinary care setting. Therefore, an effective implementation strategy of SDM in a multidisciplinary setting such as in sciatica care should focus on these barriers and facilitators. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|