Mental health in the academic Twittersphere – An analysis of conversations in the French and UK academic communities

Autor: Lugova, Alexandra, Gauttier, Stéphanie
Rok vydání: 2023
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7558250
Popis: The prevalence of mental health issues amongst researchers is well documented by the literature. 38% of researchers are at risk of mental health disorders, which is double the average population. This gets worse when looking at doctoral researchers, also called PhD candidates or PhD students, with 50% experiencing psychological distress (Levecque et al., 2017). Notwithstanding the significance of such papers to bring mental health to the agenda, they also suffer from some limitations: they offer a snapshot picture in a given country while the situation can differ across cultural and economic contexts. For instance, they do not allow seeing how the prevalence of the issue may have changed over the years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. They are also not very vocal about the causes of this distress. Some studies link it to individual characteristics such has whether or not the researcher is international (Mattijssen et al., 2020), has to provide informal care (Bergmans and Van der Weijden, 2020) as well as motivation, writing skills, academic identity, self-worth and self-efficacy (Sverdlik et al., 2018). Studies stemming from groups of doctoral researchers themselves show that some other factors play a role: the type of contracts doctoral students have, the clarity of the rules in their institution, and the regularity of supervision meetings (PhD net, 2019). Yet, there is not much research identifying good practices. For instance, Kusurkar (2020) mentions the role of affiliation with colleagues and focusing on achievements and intrinsic motivation, which is hardly actionable. Help may be offered at several levels, but not always easily accessible or fitting needs.
This document is part of the Book of Abstracts of the ReMO 2022 Conference that was organized within the framework of COST Action CA19117 - "Researcher Mental Health".
{"references":["Bergmans J, Van der Weijden I. PhD candidates as informal caregivers in the Netherlands. 2020. https://www.cwts.nl/news?article=n-r2y2a4&title=phd-candidates-as-informal-caregivers-in-the-netherlands.","Coppersmith, G., Dredze, M., & Harman, C. (2014, June). Quantifying mental health signals in Twitter. In Proceedings of the workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology: From linguistic signal to clinical reality (pp. 51-60).","Haag, P., Shankland, R., Osin, E., Boujut, É., Cazalis, F., Bruno, A. S., … & Gay, M. C. (2018). Stress perçu et santé physique des doctorants dans les universités françaises. Pratiques psychologiques, 24(1), 1-20.","Kusurkar RA, Van der Burgt S, Ulviye I. Mak-Van der Vossen M, Wilschut J, Wouters A, et al. Burnout and engagement among PhD students in medicine: the BEeP study. Perspect Med Educ. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00637-6","McClellan, C., Ali, M. M., Mutter, R., Kroutil, L., & Landwehr, J. (2017). Using social media to monitor mental health discussions− evidence from Twitter. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(3), 496-502.","Makita, M., Mas-Bleda, A., Morris, S., & Thelwall, M. (2021). Mental health discourses on Twitter during mental health awareness week. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 42(5), 437-450.","Mattijssen L, Van Vliet N, Van Doorn T, Kanbier N, Teelken C. PNN PhD Survey: Asking the relevant questions. Mental wellbeing, workload, burnout, research environment, progress of the PhD project, considering to quit. Promovendi Netwerk Nederland. 2020. https://hetpnn.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PNN-PhD-Survey-report-Wellbeing.pdf.","Ministère des solidarités et des santés. (2022). Bilan de la feuille de route au 21 janvier 2022. Accessible from https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/dp_cssmp_bilan_fdr_janvier_2022_consolide_dmsmp.13.01.22_.pdf 1st Conference of the Researcher Mental Health Observatory - ReMO 2022 Bridging Science and Practice in Supporting Researcher Mental Health","PhD Net (2019). PhD Net Survey Report accessible from https://www.phdnet.mpg.de/145345/2_PhDnet_Survey_Report_2019.pdf","Shepherd, A., Sanders, C., Doyle, M., & Shaw, J. (2015). Using social media for support and feedback by mental health service users: thematic analysis of a twitter conversation. BMC psychiatry, 15(1), 1-9.","Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students' completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388.","Valdez, D., Ten Thij, M., Bathina, K., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2020). Social media insights into US mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of Twitter data. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(12), e21418."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: