The value of measuring the prostatic resistive index vs. pressure-flow studies in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia
Autor: | Hussein Aldaqadossi, Mohammed Saad, Samir Elgamal |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Pathology Urology Qmax maximum urinary flow rate urologic and male genital diseases AG Abrams–Griffiths Pdet detrusor pressure Bladder outlet obstruction General Urology Original article Diagnosis medicine In patient TZ transition zone BPE benign prostatic enlargement Prostatic resistive index Benign prostatic hyperplasia ROC receiver operating characteristic business.industry Hyperplasia medicine.disease Resistive index PFS pressure-flow studies (p)RI (prostatic) resistive index Detrusor pressure PDI power Doppler imaging business PV prostate volume Pressure-flow studies |
Zdroj: | Arab Journal of Urology |
ISSN: | 2090-598X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.011 |
Popis: | Objective To compare the prostatic resistive index (RI) and measurements from pressure-flow studies (PFS) for the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and methods In all, 338 men (aged 55–82 years) presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms were evaluated prospectively for BOO secondary to BPH. In all patients, the prostatic RI was measured by transrectal power Doppler ultrasonography. PFS were assessed in all patients and depending on the results the patients were divided into an obstructive and an unobstructive group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the prostatic RI threshold value for predicting BOO secondary to BPH. Patients who were confirmed to have BOO secondary to BPH received either medical or surgical treatment, and they were re-evaluated after 3 and 6 months with prostatic RI measurements. Results According to the PFS the obstructive group included 158 patients and the unobstructive group 180 patients. The mean (SD) prostatic RI was significantly higher in the obstructive group, at 0.73 (0.04), than in the unobstructive group, 0.65 (0.05) (P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |