| Autor: |
Hadi Sutedja, Karel G.H. van der Wal, Maarten J. Koudstaal, Justin T van der Tas, Stephen T. H. Tjoa, Eppo B. Wolvius, Atilla Gül, Jan Pieter de Gijt |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Rok vydání: |
2023 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 15(3), 219-228. SAGE Publications Ltd |
| ISSN: |
1943-3875 |
| Popis: |
The main objective of this study was to provide an overview of the current practice for transverse mandibular and maxillary discrepancies in the Netherlands using a web-based survey. Orthodontists (ORTHO) and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (OMFS) in the Netherlands were invited to the web-based survey via their professional association. Three cases were presented which could be treated non-surgically and surgically. Participants were asked what treatment they preferred: no treatment, orthodontic treatment with optional extractions or surgically assisted orthodontic treatment. The web-based survey ended with questions on various technical aspects and any experienced complication. Invitation was sent to all 303 members of professional association for ORTHO and to all 379 members of professional association for OMFS. Overall response number was 276 (response rate of 40.5%), including 127 incomplete responses. Generally, ORTHO prefer orthodontic treatment with optional extractions and OMFS lean towards surgically assisted orthodontic treatment. Mandibular Midline Distraction appears to be less preferred, possibly due to lack of clinical experience or knowledge by both professions despite being proven clinical stable surgical technique with stable long-term outcomes. There seems to be consensus on technical aspects by both professions, however, there are various thoughts on duration of consolidation period. Complications are mostly minor and manageable. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
