| Popis: |
In order to study the impact of increased mental workload on motion detection, twenty-four observers performed a motion discrimination task in which they had to detect odd moving patches. Two types of moving patches were used, namely luminance-based and contrast-based patches. For both types of patches, the motion discrimination task was performed with and without an additional N-Back task aimed at increasing the mental workload. The dual task decreased discrimination performance for both types of patches, but the difference was significantly larger for contrast-based patches, i.e., for second-order motion stimuli, both as an absolute and relative increment. This suggests that motion discrimination requires larger cognitive resources for contrast-based than for luminance-based stimuli, thereby hinting at the higher complexity of the cognitive mechanisms underlying second-order motion detection. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect