Young children's future-oriented reasoning for self and other: Effects of conflict and perspective
| Autor: | Katie Cassidy, Joshua L. Rutt, Caitlin E. V. Mahy, Cristina M. Atance |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Gratification
05 social sciences Perspective (graphical) Adaptive decision making Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Delay of gratification 16. Peace & justice 050105 experimental psychology Task (project management) Child Development Psychological Distance Reward Perspective-taking Child Preschool Inhibitory control Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Construal level theory Psychology Child Problem Solving 050104 developmental & child psychology Cognitive psychology Forecasting |
| Zdroj: | Journal of experimental child psychology. 209 |
| ISSN: | 1096-0457 |
| Popis: | Young children reason more adaptively about the future (e.g., predicting preferences and delaying gratification) when they are asked to think about another person’s perspective versus their own perspective. An explanation for this “other-over-self” advantage is that in contexts where current (e.g., small reward now) and future (e.g., larger reward later) desires conflict, adopting the perspective of another person provides psychological distance and hence more adaptive decision making by reducing conflict. We tested this hypothesis in 158 preschoolers using a battery of representative future-oriented reasoning tasks (Preferences, Delay of Gratification, Picture Book, and “Spoon”) in which we varied the perspective children adopted (self or other) and the level of conflict between current and future desires (high or low). We predicted that perspective and conflict would interact such that children would benefit most from taking the perspective of “other” when conflict was high. Although results did not support this hypothesis, we found significant effects of conflict; children reasoned more optimally on our low-conflict task condition than on our high-conflict task condition, and these differences did not appear to be related to inhibitory control. The effect of conflict was most marked in younger preschoolers, resulting in Age × Conflict interactions on two of our four tasks. An other-over-self advantage (i.e., perspective effect) was detected on the Preferences task only. These results add to the growing body of literature on children’s future thinking by showing the important role of conflict (and its interaction with age) in the accuracy with which children reason about the future. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect