Study on the effect of percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
| Autor: | Lei Shi, Xiao-Feng Qiao, Ji Qinghui, Xue Yu, Shi-Chen Liu |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Percutaneous Visual analogue scale medicine.medical_treatment Operative Time Observational Study Lumbar vertebrae lumbar disc herniation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Discectomy fenestration discectomy Humans Medicine Diskectomy Percutaneous 030212 general & internal medicine Diskectomy Aged Retrospective Studies Lumbar Vertebrae medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Endoscopy Retrospective cohort study General Medicine percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic discectomy Middle Aged Oswestry Disability Index Surgery Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Quality of Life Female business Spinal Canal Intervertebral Disc Displacement Research Article |
| Zdroj: | Medicine |
| ISSN: | 1536-5964 0025-7974 |
| Popis: | This study explored the effect of percutaneous intervertebral foraminoscopic discectomy (PIFD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This retrospective study collected a total of 88 patient cases for inclusion. Epidemiological and clinical data of patients with LDH at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University between May 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 44 patients received PIFD and were allocated to an intervention group. The other 44 patients administrated fenestration discectomy (FD), and were assigned to a control group. We compared surgery time (minute), incision length (cm), duration of hospital stay after surgery (day), pain intensity (as checked by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), health-related quality of life (as examined by Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), and complications between 2 groups. There were not significant differences in surgery time (minute) (P = .56), VAS (P = .33) and ODI (P = .46) after surgery between 2 groups. However, there were significant differences in incision size (cm) (P .05). The findings of this study showed that both PIFD and FD benefit patients with LDH. However, PIFD can benefit patients more than FD in the incision size and duration of hospital stay after surgery. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|