Auctoritates ethicorum Jana z Ząbkowic († 1446): autor, charakter tekstu i wykorzystane źródła (od 'translacio arabica' do Akwinaty)

Autor: Marcin Bukała
Jazyk: polština
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7539232
Popis: The article is dedicated to the abbrevia­tion of Nicomachean ethics written by Wrocław Dominican John of Ząbkowi­ce (in manuscripts: „Johannes de Franc­kenstein”). The text, titled Auctoritates ethicorum, is preserved in only one ma­nuscript – Wrocław, Bibl. Univ. Wrocł., ms. IV Q 52, scriptum per manus Johan­nis de Franckenstein – together with Au­ctoritates politicorum, Auctoritates ycono­micorum and Auctoritates rethoricorum. The authorship of the texts is not certa­in, but in the previous works of histo­rians it is attributed to John (that thesis is followed also by Ch. Lohr listing the Aristotelian medieval commentaries, and by T. Kaeppeli in his compendium on the medieval Dominican scriptores). On­ly the part of Auctoritates ethicorum has been edited so far: the fragment, con­cerning the geometrical model of eco­nomic exchange and nature of money from the Book V. The author of the ar­ticle published it in his book Zagadnie­nia ekonomiczne w nauczaniu wrocław­skiej szkoły dominikańskiej w późnym średniowieczu (Wrocław 2004); this fragment was later referred in details al­so in the book of the same author: „Oeco­nomica mediaevalia” of Wrocław Domini­cans. Library and Studies of Friars, and Ethical-Economic Ideas: the Example from Silesia (Spoleto 2010). The sources of the text of Auctorita­tes ethicorum are the following: trans­latio Lincoliensis of the Aristotelian text, Sententia libri ethicorum by Thomas Aquinas, paraphrasis of Ethica by Alber­tus Magnus, and Summa Alexandrino­rum (called translacio arabica). The frag­ments of the Book IV and Book V, described in the article, shed light on the method applied in the Auctoritates. Su­mma Alexandrinorum is quoted in the de­scription of the virtue of liberalitas. Writing about diversity of artes and occupations the author cites Albertus Magnus, quoting after him the senten­ce delivered from Michael Ephesius, erroneously attributed to Eustratius by Albert. However, the Albertinian refe­rence to the role of compensation of la­bores & expensa is omitted. The author of the Auctoritates refers mainly to po­ints the common to St. Thomas and St. Albert.
Databáze: OpenAIRE