Lefamulin efficacy and safety in a pooled phase 3 clinical trial population with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and common clinical comorbidities

Autor: Christian Sandrock, Susanne Paukner, Thomas M. File, Anita Das, Elizabeth Alexander, Gregory J. Moran, Lisa Goldberg
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Male
Respiratory System
Moxifloxacin
Phases of clinical research
Administration
Oral

Pleuromutilin
Comorbidity
Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Cardiovascular
0302 clinical medicine
80 and over
030212 general & internal medicine
Lung
Aged
80 and over

0303 health sciences
education.field_of_study
Bacterial
Middle Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infectious Diseases
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Thioglycolates
Administration
Respiratory
Administration
Intravenous

Female
Diterpenes
Intravenous
Infection
medicine.drug
Fluoroquinolones
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Oral
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Population
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
Diseases of the respiratory system
Double-Blind Method
Clinical Research
Internal medicine
Diabetes mellitus
medicine
Pneumonia
Bacterial

Humans
Polycyclic Compounds
education
Asthma
Aged
RC705-779
030306 microbiology
business.industry
Prevention
Research
Bacterial pneumonia
Antibiotic
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Pneumonia
medicine.disease
United States
Good Health and Well Being
Heart failure
Clinical response
business
Lefamulin
Zdroj: BMC Pulmonary Medicine, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC pulmonary medicine, vol 21, iss 1
ISSN: 1471-2466
Popis: Background Lefamulin, a first-in-class pleuromutilin antibiotic approved for intravenous and oral use in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), was noninferior to moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 1 intravenous-to-oral switch study and the LEAP 2 oral-only study. Using pooled LEAP 1/2 data, we examined lefamulin efficacy/safety overall and within subgroups of patients presenting with comorbidities typical in CABP management. Methods In LEAP 1, adults with CABP were randomized to receive intravenous lefamulin (150 mg every 12 h) for 5‒7 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days, with optional intravenous-to-oral switch if predefined improvement criteria were met. In LEAP 2, adults with CABP were randomized to receive oral lefamulin (600 mg every 12 h) for 5 days or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h) for 7 days. Both studies assessed early clinical response (ECR) at 96 ± 24 h after first study drug dose and investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) at test-of-cure (5‒10 days after last dose). Pooled analyses of the overall population used a 10% noninferiority margin. Results Lefamulin (n = 646) was noninferior to moxifloxacin (n = 643) for ECR (89.3% vs 90.5%, respectively; difference − 1.1%; 95% CI − 4.4 to 2.2); IACR success rates at test-of-cure were similarly high (≥ 85.0%). High efficacy with both lefamulin and moxifloxacin was also demonstrated across all well-represented patient subgroups, including those with advanced age, diabetes mellitus, a history of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., hypertension, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmia) or chronic lung diseases (e.g., asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), elevated liver enzymes, or mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions Lefamulin may provide a valuable intravenous/oral monotherapy alternative to fluoroquinolones or macrolides for empiric treatment of patients with CABP, including cases of patients at risk for poor outcomes due to age or various comorbidities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov LEAP 1 (NCT02559310; Registration Date: 24/09/2015) and LEAP 2 (NCT02813694; Registration Date: 27/06/2016).
Databáze: OpenAIRE