Is the routine pressure dressing after thyroidectomy necessary? A prospective randomized controlled study
Autor: | Sanguansak Thanaviratananich, Wisoot Reechaipichitkul, Patravoot Vatanasapt, Warinthorn Phuttharak, Patorn Piromchai |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry Acute complication medicine.medical_treatment Thyroidectomy Airway obstruction medicine.disease lcsh:Otorhinolaryngology lcsh:RF1-547 Surgery law.invention Hematoma Otorhinolaryngology Randomized controlled trial law medicine Head and neck surgery Intubation business Research Article |
Zdroj: | BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, Vol 8, Iss 1, p 1 (2008) BMC Ear, Nose, and Throat Disorders |
ISSN: | 1472-6815 |
Popis: | Background An acute complication of thyroidectomy is fatal hematoma, which can produce an upper airway obstruction needing immediate intubation or tracheostomy. After neck surgery, we usually apply a pressure dressing with a non-woven, adhesive fabric to reduce bleeding and fluid collection at the operative bed. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate a pressure vs. a non-pressure dressing after thyroid surgery by monitoring blood and serum in the operative bed. Methods We studied 108 patients who underwent 116 thyroid surgeries at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, between December 2006 and September 2007. The patients were randomized to either the pressure dressing or non-pressure dressing group. Ultrasound of the neck was performed 24 ± 3 hours after surgery. The volume of fluid collection in the operative bed was calculated. All patients were observed for any post-operative respiratory distress, wound complications, tingling sensation or tetany. Results The distributions of age, sex, surgical indications and approaches were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the volume of fluid collection in the operative bed (p = 0.150) and the collected drained content (p = 0.798). The average time a drain was retained was 3 days. One patient in the pressure dressing group suffered cutaneous bruising while one patient in the non-pressure dressing group developed immediate hemorrhage after the skin sutures. Conclusion Pressure dressing after thyroidectomy does not have any significant impact on decreasing fluid collection at the operative bed. The use of pressure dressing after thyroidectomy may not therefore be justified. Trial Registration NCT00400465, ISRCTN52660978 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |