Feasibility of a pharmacist-facilitated medicines review intervention for community-dwelling Māori older adults

Autor: Nataly Martini, Hunter Amende, Joanna Hikaka, Rhys Jones, Martin J. Connolly, Carmel Hughes
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, Vol 2, Iss, Pp 100018-(2021)
Hikaka, J, Hughes, C, Jones, R, Amende, H, Connolly, M J & Martini, N 2022, ' Feasibility of a pharmacist-facilitated medicines review intervention for community-dwelling Māori older adults ', Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, vol. 2, 100018 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100018
ISSN: 2667-2766
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100018
Popis: Background Pharmacist-facilitated medicines review services have been postulated as a way to address current inequities in health outcomes between Māori and non-Māori. These interventions have been shown internationally to improve the appropriate use of medicines but remain underutilised in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). By reviewing the literature and engaging with key stakeholders, we developed an intervention, which included collaborative goal-setting, education and medicines optimisation, for testing in a feasibility study. Objective To determine the feasibility (recruitment, intervention delivery, and data collection methods) of a pharmacist-facilitated medicines review intervention for Māori older adults, and proposed intervention outcomes. Methods This study was reported in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised controlled pilot and feasibility trials and the Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement. Participant eligibility criteria were: Māori; aged 55-plus; community-dwelling; enrolled in a general practice in Waitematā District Health Board (Auckland, NZ). Consented participants engaged in a medicines education component (participant and pharmacist) and an optional medicines optimisation component (participant, pharmacist and prescriber). Outcomes measures included: the feasibility of data collection tools and methods, time taken to conduct the intervention and research processes; medicines knowledge, medicines appropriateness and quality of life (QoL); pharmacist recommendations and prescriber acceptance rate. Results Seventeen consented participants took part in the intervention from December 2019–March 2020 with the majority (n = 12) recruited through general practice mail-outs. Data collection was feasible using the predetermined outcome measure tools and was complete for all patient participants. Pharmacist intervention delivery was feasible. A mean of 9.5 recommendations were made per participant with a prescriber acceptance rate of 95%. These included non-medicine-related recommendations. Conclusion The feasibility testing of pharmacist-facilitated medicines review intervention developed for (and with) community-dwelling Māori older adults allows for intervention refinement and can be utilised for further studies relating to pharmacist services in primary care.
Databáze: OpenAIRE