Should animal welfare regulations be more restrictive? A case study in eight European Union Countries

Autor: Zein Kallas, Niloofar Pejman, Antoni Dalmau, Antonio Velarde
Přispěvatelé: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Agroalimentària i Biotecnologia, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. CREDA - Centre de Recerca en Economia i Desenvolupament Agroalimentari, Producció Animal, Benestar Animal
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
030309 nutrition & dietetics
media_common.quotation_subject
Animals -- Protecció
Legislation
Article
animal welfare
consumers
03 medical and health sciences
Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ramaderia::Alimentació i nutrició animal [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC]
Animal welfare
lcsh:Zoology
Credibility
Drets dels animals
media_common.cataloged_instance
Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ramaderia::Producció animal [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC]
lcsh:QL1-991
European union
Socioeconomic status
Restrictiveness
media_common
0303 health sciences
lcsh:Veterinary medicine
General Veterinary
Public economics
business.industry
0402 animal and dairy science
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
040201 dairy & animal science
citizens
Citizens
lcsh:SF600-1100
Agrotech
Animal Science and Zoology
Livestock
Consumers
Business
EU
Welfare
Zdroj: UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
Animals
Volume 9
Issue 4
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname
IRTA Pubpro. Open Digital Archive
Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA)
Animals, Vol 9, Iss 4, p 195 (2019)
Popis: Increasingly, intensive livestock production systems have increased societal concern regarding the current animal welfare standards. We investigated whether individuals in their roles as consumers and citizens believe that the current European regulations regarding animal welfare should be more restrictive. Factors affecting this decision were assessed by analyzing respondents&rsquo
understanding of animal welfare-related issues, their subjective and objective knowledge levels, the credibility they assign to different information sources, their perceptions toward the current restrictiveness of animal welfare standards, and their socioeconomic characteristics. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed in eight European Union (EU) countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) with 3860 total responses. The results showed that consumers are more reluctant to adopt more restrictive regulations than respondents in the role of citizens. Respondents from northern European countries (Poland and Sweden) are more likely to support regulations that are more restrictive than the current minimum requirements than respondents from southern countries (Spain and Italy). Women were found to be more concerned with the welfare of pigs and laying hens&mdash
lending credibility to the Internet as an information source&mdash
and were more likely to support more restrictive animal welfare legislation.
Databáze: OpenAIRE