Propensity score analysis in patients with and without previous isolated coronary artery bypass grafting who require proximal aortic and arch surgery
Autor: | Qianzi Zhang, Subhasis Chatterjee, Hiruni S. Amarasekara, Matt D. Price, Scott A. LeMaire, Sandra J. Woodside, Ourania Preventza, Susan Y. Green, Joseph S. Coselli |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Aortic arch medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Aorta Thoracic Coronary Artery Disease Kaplan-Meier Estimate 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Aortic valve replacement Risk Factors law medicine.artery Cardiopulmonary bypass medicine Humans Coronary Artery Bypass Propensity Score Stroke Aorta Retrospective Studies business.industry medicine.disease Surgery Treatment Outcome surgical procedures operative medicine.anatomical_structure 030228 respiratory system Cohort Propensity score matching Hemodialysis Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery |
Zdroj: | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 164:1390-1396.e2 |
ISSN: | 0022-5223 |
Popis: | The risk posed by previous isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients who require proximal aortic or aortic arch surgery is unclear. We compared outcomes of ascending aortic and arch procedures in patients with and without previous CABG.Using propensity scores, we created 2 matched groups of patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery, including total arch repairs, at our institution: 126 patients who underwent isolated CABG before the index operation and 126 without previous CABG. Forty-four percent of aortic operations were emergency procedures. Eighty-six patients had a patent previous left internal mammary graft. We compared outcomes between the 2 groups and calculated Kaplan-Meier survival curves.The following outcomes were recorded for the patients with previous isolated CABG versus no CABG: operative mortality, 15.9% versus 11.1% (P = .3); 30-day mortality, 13.5% versus 7.1% (P = .1); persistent stroke, 6.3% versus 4.8% (P = .6); and renal failure necessitating hemodialysis at discharge, 7.9% versus 4.0% (P = .2). Previous CABG did not independently predict any adverse outcome, even though patients who underwent previous CABG more frequently needed intra-aortic balloon support (P .01). The P value for the overall intergroup difference in long-term survival was .06.This is one of the largest studies yet reported to examine the impact of previous isolated CABG on proximal aortic or arch surgery outcomes. Although these results may be specific to aortic centers of excellence, in this complicated patient cohort, previous isolated CABG did not independently predict any adverse outcome. These results could serve as a benchmark for assessing future endovascular therapies. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |