Factors related to pro-environmental and anti-ecological behaviors : Systematic Review of the Literature 2007-2017

Autor: Anaya Hernández, Eva Johanna, Martínez Porras, Diana Marcela
Přispěvatelé: Varona-Uribe, Marcela
Jazyk: Spanish; Castilian
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Aguilar, L., García, J., Monteoliva, A. & Salinas, J.El modelo del valor, las normas y las creencias hacia el medio ambiente en la predicción de la conducta ecológica. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 2006, 7(2), 21–44
Pato, C., Ros, M. & Tamayo, A. Creencias y comportamiento ecológico: un estudio empírico con estudiantes brasilenos. ˜ Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 2005, 6(1), 5–22.
Rivera, J. M. & Rodríguez, U. C. Actitudes y comportamientos ambientales en estudiantes de enfermería de una universidad pública del norte de Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 2009, 26(3), 338–342
Sandoval Escobar, M. C. (2012). Comportamiento sustentable y educación ambiental: una visión desde las prácticas culturales. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(1), 181–196
Elvan, A. & Tekkaya, C. An investigation on value orientations, attitudes and concern towards the environment: The case of Turkish elementary school students. Environmental Education Research, 2012,18(2), 271–297
Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G. M. Psicología social (5.a ed.). Madrid, Espana: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2008
Moyano, D. E., Cornejo, F. A. & Gallardo, I. Creencias y conductas ambientales, liberalismo económico y felicidad. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 2011, 14(2), 69–77
Bamberg, S. y Möser, G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new metaanalysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25, 2007
Castro, P., Mouro, C., & Gouveia, R. The conservation of biodiversity in protected areas: Comparing the presentation of legal innovations in the national and the regional press. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 539-555, 2012
Félonneau, M.-L., & Becker, M. Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviour: Revealing perceived social desirability. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 21, 25-53, 2008
Gaspar, R. Understanding the Reasons for Behavioral Failure: A Process View of Psychosocial Barriers and Constraints to Pro-Ecological Behavior. Open Access, sustainability, 5, 2960-2975, 2013
Gifford, R. Environmental psychology matters. The Annual Review of Psychology, 2014, (65), 541–579
Herzog, T. R. & Strevey, S. J. Contact with nature, sense of humor, and psychological well-being. Environment & Behavior, 2008, 40(6), 747-776
Barton, J. J., Hine, R. R. & Pretty, J. J. The health benefits of walking in greenspaces of high natural and heritage value. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 2009, 6(4), 261-278
Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L. & Gagné, M. Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(2), 159-168
Corraliza, J. A. & Collado, S. La naturaleza cercana como moderadora del estrés infantil. Psicothema, 2011,23(2), 221-226
Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 2007, 63(1), 117-137
Saldaña-Durán, C.E. y Messina-Fernández, S.R. (Coordinadores). Cultura Ambiental. Colección 45 años de Vida Universitaria. Ecorfan. Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit Ciudad de la Cultura Amado Nervo Boulevard Tepic-Xalisco S/N C.P. 63190 Tepic, Nayarit, México, 2014
Martínez-García, J. A. & Martínez-Caro L. La validez discriminante como criterio de evaluación de escalas: ¿teoría o estadística? Universitas Psychologica, 8(1), 27-36
Gifford, R. and Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: a review. International Journal of Psychology, Vol 49 No. 3, 141-157, 2014
Bertoldo,R. Castro P. and Barbara, A. Creenciaas y Comportamientos proambientales: dos niveles de respuesta a las normas sociales ambientales. rev.latinoam.psicol. 2013, vol.45, n.3, pp.435-446. ISSN 0120-0534
Palacios, J.R. Bustos, M. y Soler, Leonardo. Factores socioculturales vinculados al comportamiento proambiental en jóvenes. Revista de Psicología – Universidad de Chile. 24(1), 1-16, 2015
Martín Rodríguez, A. M. Pacheco, C. ando Rodríguez A. The justification of ilegal anti-ecologial behavior. Psicothema, Vol25 No. 3, 336-341, 2013
Dunlap, R. E. The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3-18, 2008
IPCC. Working Group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report: Synthesis for policymakers, 2013
Kazdin, A. Psychological science’s contribution to a sustainable environment. American Psychologist, 64(5), 339-356, 2009
Lee, S., & Paik, H. S. Korean household waste management and recycling behavior. Building and Environment, 46, 1159–1166, 2011
Salgado, S. y Oceja, L. Towards a characterization of a motive whose ultimate goal is to increase the welfare of the world: Quixoteism. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 145-155, 2011
Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351-367, 2010
Milfont, T. L. Psychology of environmental attitudes: A cross-cultural study of their content and structure. University of Auckland, New Zealand, 2007
Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259-84, 2010
Pavalache-Ilie, Mariela; Unianu, Ecaterina M. Locus of control and the pro-environmental attitudes. Elsevier. Sciverse Scence Direct. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 33 198-202k, 2012
Steg, L. Bolderdij, J.W. Keizer, K., Perlaviciute, G. An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of environmental Psychology 38, 104-115, 2014
Turaga,R.M., Howarth R. and Borsuk, M. Pro-environmental behavior. Rational Choice meets moral motivation. Ann N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1185. New York Academy of sciences, 2010
Crumpei, I.; Boncu, Stefn, Crumpei, G. Environmental Attitudes and Ecological Moral Reasoning in Romanian Students. 4th World Conference on Psychology, Counseling and Guidance WCPCG-2013
Denis, H. D., & Pereira, L. N. Measuring the level of endorsement of the new environmental paradigm: A transnational study. Dos Algarves: A Multidisciplinary e-Journal, 23, 4–26, 2014
Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 2011, 66, 290–302, 2011
De Berenguer, Jaime. Actitudes y creencias ambientales una explicacion psicosocial del comportamiento ecologico. ResearchGate. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España, 2015.
Heyd, T. Climate change, individual responsibilities and cultural frameworks. Human Ecology Review, 17(2), 86–95, 2010
M. T., & Fiske, S. T. It’s all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193-1201, 2008
Monteiro, R., Plínio, R., Teixeira, V., Gosling, M., & Gonçalves, M. Personalidade e consumo ecologicamente consciente. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 7, 30-49, 2008
Amérigo, M., García, J., Sánchez, T. Actitudes y comportamientos hacia el medio ambiente natural. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, 2012, España
Dundelová, J. Issues of environmental (ir) responsibility.Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et silviulturae mendelianae Brunensis. Volumen LXIU, No. 7, 2013
Amburgey, J. W., & Thoman, D. B. Dimensionality of the new ecological paradigm: Issues of factor structure and measurement. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 235–256, 2012
Berenguer, J. The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42, 110-134, 2010
Brennan, L., Binney, W., Aleti, T., & Parker, L. Why validation is important: An example using the NEP scales. Market and Social Research, 22(2), 15–31, 2014
Busra, T., Ozgul, Y.T., Gaye, T.T. The relationship between environmental moral reasoning and environmental attitudes of pre-service sicence teachers, International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 2011
Castro, P., & Mouro, C. Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: Insights from biodiversity conservation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 362-73, 2011
Castro, P., Garrido, M., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. Ambivalence and conservation behaviour: An exploratory study on the recycling of metal cans. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 24–33, 2009
Castro, Paula, Carla Mouro, and Rita Gouveia. "The conservation of biodiversity in protected areas: Comparing the presentation of legal innovations in the national and the regional press." Society & Natural Resources 25.6 (2012): 539-555
Olivos Jara, P., Talayero, F.,Aragonés, J.I., Moyano-Díaz, E. Dimensiones del Comportamiento Proambiental y su Relación con la Conectividad e Identidad Ambientales. Dossiê: Psicologia Ambiental Comportamento Pró-Ambiental e Sustentabilidade. v. 45, n. 3, pp. 369-376, 2014
Dubois, N. La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble,2008
Cho, Y., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M., Park, S., & Lee, H. To be or not to be green: Exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1052-1059, 2013
Kaiser, F. G. & Byrka, K. Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 71-79, 2011
Moyano-Díaz, Emilio y Palomo-Vélez, Gonzalo. Propiedades psicométricas e la Escala Nuevo paradigma ecológico en población chilena. Dossie: Psicología ambiental, Vol 45 No. 3, pp 415-423, Julio a Octubre de 2014
Oceja, L. & Salgado, S. Why do we help? World change orientation as an antecedent of a prosocial action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 127-136, 2013
Pires, P., De castro, R., Filgueiras, A. Ecocentrism and behavior: a bibliographic review on environmetnal values. Psicol. estud. vol.19 no.4 Maringá, 2014
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957-972, 2011
Tabernero, C. and Hernández, B. Self-efficacy ando intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and behavior 43(5) 658-675, 2011
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463, 2010
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95, 2007
Xiao, Cheyang, Buhrmann, Jan. The Structure and Coherence of the New Environmental Paradigm: Reconceptualizing the Dimensionality Debate. Human Ecology Review, Volume 23, Number 1, 2017
Repositorio EdocUR-U. Rosario
Universidad del Rosario
instacron:Universidad del Rosario
DOI: 10.48713/10336_18114
Popis: Introducción: Las conductas protectoras del ambiente reflejan el interés creciente de delimitar todos aquellos problemas asociados con los comportamientos ambientales en las diferentes culturas y la necesidad de llevar a cabo acciones contundentes que eslabonen conductas ambientales sustentables. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática de la literatura desde el 2007 al 2017, con el fin de caracterizar los factores que influyen en el comportamiento pro –ambiental y anti-ecológico de diferentes grupos poblacionales. Materiales y métodos: Para la revisión se emplearon las bases de datos Scielo, SpringerLink, Elsevier, Researchgate, para un periodo de tiempo de 2007 a 2017, en idioma inglés y español, con los términos de búsqueda comportamiento pro ambiental, comportamiento antiecológico, factor actitudinal, factor situacional y factor individual. Se revisaron un total de 50 artículos. Resultados: Se evidencia a través de la literatura analizada que se han logrado identificar una serie de factores actitudinales, situacionales e individuales, que han influido en la realidad de los actores sociales y que marcan la conducta respecto a los comportamientos pro-ambientales y los comportamientos anti-ecológicos. Dicha identificación de los factores, ha ayudado a tener claridad sobre las intervenciones que se deben llevar a cabo para poder implementar un cambio. Conclusión: el perfil social juega un papel importante en las conductas pro-ambientales haciendo que los individuos se preocupen más por el ambiente, actuando de forma responsable con el mismo. Cuando se tiene un conocimiento preciso del ambiente, sus problemas y soluciones potenciales, esto genera una personalidad abierta, agradable y concienzuda, llevándolo a considerar una potencialidad frente a los comportamientos de control del ambiente, manteniendo normas y acciones pro ambientalistas. Introduction: Protective behaviors in the environment reflect the growing interest in delimiting all those problems associated with environmental behaviors in different cultures and the need to carry out forceful actions that link sustainable environmental behaviors. Objective: To carry out a systematic review of the literature from 2007 to 2017, in order to characterize the factors that influence the pro-environmental and anti-ecological behavior of different population groups. Materials and methods: Scielo, SpringerLink, Elsevier, Researchgate databases were used for the review for a period of time from 2007 to 2017, in English and Spanish, with the search terms behavior pro environmental, anti-ecological behavior, factor attitudinal, situational factor and individual factor. A total of 50 articles were reviewed. Results: It is evidenced through the analyzed literature that a series of attitudinal, situational and individual factors have been identified that have influenced the reality of the social actors and that mark the behavior with respect to the pro-environmental behaviors and behaviors anti-ecological This identification of the factors has helped to clarify the interventions that must be carried out in order to implement a change. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the social profile plays an important role in pro-environmental behaviors, making individuals more concerned about the environment, acting responsibly with it. When you have a precise knowledge of the environment, its problems and potential solutions, this generates an open, pleasant and conscientious personality, leading you to consider a potential in the face of environmental control behavior, maintaining norms and pro-environmental actions. 2020-06-23 01:01:01: Script de automatizacion de embargos. info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2020-06-22
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: