Immobilized pH gradient-driven paper-based IEF: a new method for fractionating complex peptide mixtures before MS analysis
Autor: | Kondethimmanahalli H. Chandramouli, Kumaraguru Raja, Beerelli Seshi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: |
Clinical Biochemistry
Clinical proteomics lcsh:Medicine Peptide Fractionation Mass spectrometry Bioinformatics Progenitor cells 01 natural sciences 03 medical and health sciences Paper IEF Molecular Biology 030304 developmental biology chemistry.chemical_classification 0303 health sciences Chromatography Filter paper Research lcsh:R 010401 analytical chemistry General Medicine 0104 chemical sciences Electrophoresis iTRAQ Membrane protein chemistry Proteome Molecular Medicine Immobilized pH gradient Offgel electrophoresis |
Zdroj: | Seshi, Beerelli; Raja, Kumaraguru; & Chandramouli, KH. (2011). Immobilized pH Gradient-Driven Paper-Based IEF: A New Method for Fractionating Complex Peptide Mixtures Before MS Analysis. Clinical Proteomics, 8(1), 10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1559-0275-8-10. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2908z80t Clinical Proteomics, Vol 8, Iss 1, p 10 (2011) Clinical proteomics |
ISSN: | 1559-0275 1542-6416 |
Popis: | Introduction The vast difference in the abundance of different proteins in biological samples limits the determination of the complete proteome of a cell type, requiring fractionation of proteins and peptides before MS analysis. Methods We present a method consisting of electrophoresis of complex mixtures of peptides using a strip of filter paper cut into 20 sections laid end to end over a 24-cm-long IPG strip, the pH gradient of which would drive the electrophoresis. Peptides absorbed onto individual paper pads after electrophoresis are subsequently recovered into a buffer solution, thus dividing a complex peptide mixture according to pI into 20 liquid fractions. This paper-based IEF method (PIEF) was compared side-by-side with a similar but liquid-based Offgel electrophoresis (OGE) by analyzing iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixtures of membrane proteins from four different cell types. Results PIEF outperformed OGE in resolving acidic peptides, whereas OGE did a better job in recovering relatively basic peptides. OGE and PIEF were quite comparable in their coverage, identifying almost equal number of distinct proteins (PIEF =1174; OGE = 1080). Interestingly, however, only 675 were identified by both of them, each method identifying many unique proteins (PIEF = 499; OGE = 415). Thus, the two methods uncovered almost 40% more proteins compared to what is obtained by only one method. Conclusion: This initial investigation demonstrates the technical feasibility of PIEF for complementing OGE. PIEF uses standard IPG IEF equipment, requires no specialized apparatus (e.g., OGE fractionator) and may be integrated into peptide mapping strategies for clinical samples. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |