A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Study of Maralixibat in the Treatment of Itching Associated With Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Autor: | Raj Vuppalanchi, Alejandro Dorenbaum, David Jones, Gideon M. Hirschfield, George Apostol, Joan Gu, Bruce R. Bacon, Ciara Kennedy, Marlyn J. Mayo, Cynthia Levy, Velimir A. Luketic, Sharon Medendorp, I Patanwala, Patricia Novak, Christopher L. Bowlus, Paul J. Pockros |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.drug_class Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities Phases of clinical research Placebo Gastroenterology Clinical Research Internal medicine medicine Clinical endpoint skin and connective tissue diseases Adverse effect Hepatology Bile acid business.industry Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions Original Articles Confidence interval Ursodeoxycholic acid 6.1 Pharmaceuticals Itching Original Article medicine.symptom Digestive Diseases business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Hepatology communications, vol 3, iss 3 Hepatology Communications |
ISSN: | 2471-254X |
DOI: | 10.1002/hep4.1305 |
Popis: | Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is typically associated with elevated serum bile acid levels and pruritus, but pruritus is often refractory to treatment with existing therapies. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of maralixibat, a selective, ileal, apical, sodium-dependent, bile acid transporter inhibitor, in adults with PBC and pruritus. Adults with PBC and pruritus who had received ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for ≥6months or were intolerant to UDCA were randomized 2:1 to maralixibat (10 or 20mg/day) or placebo for 13 weeks in combination with UDCA (when tolerated). The primary outcome was change in Adult Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO™) average weekly sum score (0, no itching; 70, maximum itching) from baseline to week 13/early termination (ET). The study enrolled 66 patients (maralixibat [both doses combined], n = 42; placebo, n=24). Mean ItchRO™ weekly sum scores decreased from baseline to week 13/ET with maralixibat (-26.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -31.8, -21.2) and placebo (-23.4; 95% CI, -30.3, -16.4). The difference between groups was not significant (P=0.48). In the maralixibat and placebo groups, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.6% and 70.8% of patients, respectively. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported AEs (maralixibat, 78.6%; placebo, 50.0%). Conclusion: Reductions in pruritus did not differ significantly between maralixibat and placebo. However, a large placebo effect may have confounded assessment of pruritus. Lessons learned from this rigorously designed and executed trial are indispensable for understanding how to approach trials assessing pruritus as the primary endpoint and the therapeutic window of bile acid uptake inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in PBC. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |