Augmentation of temporal fossa hollowing with Mersilene mesh
Autor: | Naresh Joshi, Duncan D. Atherton, Niall Kirkpatrick |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2010 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Bone Screws Orbital decompression Temporalis muscle Resection medicine Deformity Humans Titanium Polyethylene Terephthalates business.industry Temporal Bone Fascia Middle Aged Plastic Surgery Procedures Surgical Mesh Carcinoma Adenoid Cystic Cranioplasty Surgery Graves Ophthalmopathy Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure Female Implant Temporal fossa medicine.symptom business Bone Plates |
Zdroj: | Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 63:1629-1634 |
ISSN: | 1748-6815 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.022 |
Popis: | Summary Purpose Temporal fossa hollowing can represent a serious cosmetic concern to patients', whether congenital; part of a post-traumatic deformity; following oncological resection; or following orbital decompression procedures. Various methods have been described to augment the defect including high density polyethylene (HDPE) implants, methyl methylmethacrolate and lipotransfer, but all have their relative drawbacks. Methods We describe 13 temporal defects in 10 patients whose defects have been reconstructed with Mersilene mesh (Ethicon, Livingstone UK). When the temporalis muscle is still adequately suspended; folded mesh can be placed in a submuscular/subperiosteal plane. The mesh can be folded as many times as necessary to recreate the appropriate volume, thereby allowing fine control of temple width. If the temporalis is attenuated or displaced inferiorly by previous surgery, its insertion can be recreated using titanium screws to attach the mesh superiorly to the appropriate site on the cranium; the temporalis resuspended and the fascia sutured to the mesh. Results We report very pleasing cosmetic results with no associated complications such as implant, extrusion or exposure. One patient was complicated by infection requiring removal of the mesh as well as titanium cranioplasty, screws and plates. Conclusion Mersilene mesh is easy to use, contours naturally to the defect and is considerably cheaper than alternatives like HDPE implants. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |