Assessment of bone density differences between conventional and bone-condensing techniques using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and radiography
| Autor: | Candan Semra Paksoy, N. Özlem Küçük, Nejat Arpak, Nuri Yazıcıoglu, Ayse Gulsahi, Hakan Terzioglu |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2007 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male musculoskeletal diseases Time Factors Bone density medicine.medical_treatment Radiography Dentistry Absorptiometry Photon Bone Density Humans Medicine Longitudinal Studies Dental implant General Dentistry Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Dental Implants Bone mineral Analysis of Variance medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Jaw Edentulous Partially Periapical radiography Dental Implantation Endosseous Middle Aged Otorhinolaryngology Bone mineral content Female Surgery Oral Surgery business Densitometry |
| Zdroj: | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 104:692-698 |
| ISSN: | 1079-2104 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.004 |
| Popis: | Objectives We used dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and periapical radiography to assess bone density differences after conventional and bone-condensing dental implant techniques. Study design Single-tooth dental implants were placed by both conventional and bone-condensing techniques in 14 patients with bilateral missing teeth. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to calculate bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) before and 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Furthermore, photodensitometry of periapical radiographs was also assessed. Results The success rate was 92.9% for the conventional technique and 71.5% for the bone-condensing technique. The BMD was observed to be significantly higher 6 and 12 months after implant placement. The BMC and photodensitometry were significantly increased 6 months after implant placement but showed no further after 12 months. Conclusions There were no significant differences in BMD, BMC, and photodensitometry between the two implant placement techniques. However, success rate of the conventional technique was greater than the bone-condensing technique, which may be the result of trabecular fracture associated with the bone-condensing. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect