Pixel T2 distribution in functional magnetic resonance images of muscle
| Autor: | Roop C. Jayaraman, Barry M. Prior, Ronald A. Meyer, J. M. Foley |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1999 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Materials science Weight Lifting Physiology Functional magnetic resonance images Spin–spin relaxation Nuclear magnetic resonance Reference Values Physiology (medical) medicine Humans Computer Simulation Muscle Skeletal Exercise Leg Muscle Denervation Pixel medicine.diagnostic_test Skeletal muscle Magnetic resonance imaging Middle Aged equipment and supplies Magnetic Resonance Imaging body regions Motor unit medicine.anatomical_structure Transverse Relaxation Time Arm Physical Endurance Female Monte Carlo Method |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Physiology. 87:2107-2114 |
| ISSN: | 1522-1601 8750-7587 |
| DOI: | 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.6.2107 |
| Popis: | Increases in skeletal muscle1H-NMR transverse relaxation time (T2) observed by magnetic resonance imaging have been used to map whole muscle activity during exercise. Some studies further suggest that intramuscular variations in T2 after exercise can be used to map activity on a pixel-by-pixel basis by defining an active T2 threshold and counting pixels that exceed the threshold as “active muscle.” This implies that motor units are nonrandomly distributed across the muscle and, therefore, that the distribution of pixel T2 values ought to be substantially broader after moderate exercise than at rest or after more intense exercise, since moderate-intensity exercise should recruit some motor units, and hence some pixels, but not others. This study examined the distribution of pixel T2 values in three muscles (quadriceps, anterior tibialis, and biceps/brachialis) of healthy subjects (5 men and 2 women, 18–46 yr old) at rest, after exercise to fatigue (50% 1 repetition maximum at 20/min to failure = Max), and at ½Max (25% 1 repetition maximum, same number of repetitions as Max). Although for each muscle there was a linear relationship between exercise intensity and mean pixel T2, there was no significant difference in the variance of pixel T2 between ½Max and Max exercise. There was a modest (10–43%) increase in variance of pixel T2 after both exercises compared with rest, but this was consistent with a Monte Carlo simulation of muscle activity that assumed a random distribution of motor unit territories across the muscle and a random distribution of muscle cells within each motor unit's territory. In addition, 40% of the pixel-to-pixel muscle T2 variations were shown to be due to imaging noise. The results indicate that magnetic resonance imaging T2 cannot reliably map active muscle on a pixel-by-pixel basis in normal subjects. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|