Measurability and reliability of assessments of root length and marginal bone level in cone beam CT and intraoral radiography: a study of adolescents
Autor: | Eman Ebrahim, Ayman Al-Okshi, Christina Lindh, Madeleine Rohlin, Liselotte Paulsson |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Cone beam computed tomography
cone-beam computed tomography Adolescent Radiography dental Root Resorption Odontologi Root length stomatognathic system Medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Bone level humans General Dentistry Cone beam ct Reliability (statistics) Orthodontics Intraoral radiography business.industry Reproducibility of Results General Medicine Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Incisor Otorhinolaryngology Dentistry reproducibility of results business orthodontics radiography Research Article |
Zdroj: | Dentomaxillofac Radiol |
ISSN: | 0250-832X |
Popis: | Objectives: To evaluate measurability and reliability of measurements of root length and marginal bone level in CBCT, periapical (PA) and bitewing (BW) radiographs. Methods: CBCT of both jaws, PA of maxillary incisors and posterior BW radiographs of 10 adolescents (mean age 13.4) were selected. The radiographs comprised part of the baseline examinations of a trial of orthodontic treatment. Six raters assessed measurability and measured root length and marginal bone level. Three raters repeated their assessments. Measurability was expressed as frequency of interpretable sites and reliability as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Measurability was 100 % in CBCT and 95 % in PA of maxillary incisors for root length measurements. For marginal bone level, measurability was 100 % in CBCT, 76 % in PA and 86 % in posterior BW. Mean ICC for interrater reliability for root length measurements in CBCT was 0.88 (range 0.27–0.96 among different teeth) and 0.69 in PA of maxillary incisors. For marginal bone level measurements, mean ICC was 0.4 in CBCT, 0.38 in PA of maxillary incisors and 0.4 in posterior BW. Intrarater reliability varied among methods, root length or marginal bone level and among raters, except for root length measurements in CBCT, which presented high reliability (above 0.8) for all raters. Conclusions: As measurability and reliability were high for root length measurements in CBCT, this may be the method of choice for scientific analyses in orthodontics. For clinical praxis, we recommend PA following the “as low as diagnostically acceptable” principle, as clinical decisions seem to be influenced only when severe root resorption occurs. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |