E-learning versus face-to-face training: Comparison of two learning methods for Lyme borreliosis
| Autor: | B. Jaulhac, M. Kelly, Y. Hansmann, G. Tanguy, L. Ouchchane, M. Gaudin, O. Lesens, M. Plagne, A. Saussac |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Virulence bactérienne précoce : fonctions cellulaires et contrôle de l'infection aiguë et subaiguë, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), The expert group for the teaching of Lyme disease |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
020205 medical informatics E-learning (theory) Concordance education 02 engineering and technology 03 medical and health sciences Face-to-face 0302 clinical medicine Lyme disease 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering medicine Humans Learning 030212 general & internal medicine Lyme Disease business.industry Internship and Residency medicine.disease 3. Good health Test (assessment) LYME Infectious Diseases [SDV.MP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Microbiology and Parasitology Family medicine Learning methods Population study Clinical Competence business Computer-Assisted Instruction |
| Zdroj: | Infectious Diseases Now Infectious Diseases Now, Elsevier, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.idnow.2021.11.001⟩ |
| ISSN: | 2666-9919 |
| Popis: | OBJECTIVES To compare two learning methods for Lyme disease (e-learning versus face-to-face training) to assess knowledge and know-how. METHODS The study population was volunteer general medicine residents and family physicians (FP). Face-to-face training on Lyme disease was offered to each group. E-learning training was then offered to those who had not attended the face-to-face training. Theoretical knowledge was assessed by an identical pre- and post-test questionnaire and know-how by a script concordance test. RESULTS Seventy learners (47 FPs and 23 general medicine residents) were included in the face-to-face training group and 61 (33 FPs and 28 general medicine residents) in the e-learning group. The pre- and post-test scores were significantly improved in the FP group (difference of 29.3±1.9 [P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect