The Weber Thesis and Economic Historians
| Autor: | Matti Peltonen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
05 social sciences Protestant-ethic thesis Capitalism Historicity (philosophy) 0506 political science Epistemology Ethos Protestantism historicity of Weber’s concepts 050903 gender studies Argument 8. Economic growth economic historians 050602 political science & public administration Criticism Protestant work ethic Sociology 0509 other social sciences Social science Asceticism capitalism and religion media_common |
| Zdroj: | Max Weber Studies. 8:79-98 |
| ISSN: | 2056-4074 1470-8078 |
| DOI: | 10.15543/mws/2008/1/4 |
| Popis: | One of the most exciting and most discussed economic theories is the one proposed by Max Weber in his essay The Protestant Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Capitalism (1904–1905). According to Weber, the Protestant ethic, a mode of behaviour whereby ascetic ways of life were motivated by Protestant theological ideas, had changed during the previous century into a ‘spirit’ of capitalism, a new lifestyle or ethos, in which hard work or accumulation could only be motivated with the most commonplace ideas about work and accumulation being their own rewards. Unfortunately, his argument was too complicated for his contemporary readers and was simplified along the lines of an older model to that of the theory which we nowadays recognize as the Weber Thesis. This simplified version claims that Protestant religion (or the Reformation) was the cause of (or at least the most suitable religion for) Western capitalism. For some reason this latter version, which has lost all contact with the historicity of Weber’s concepts, has satisfied most social scientists. The case of economic historians is, however, quite different. The so-called Weber Thesis has been the target of criticism and protests from the ranks of economic historians throughout most the twentieth century. It is interesting to investigate how successful economic historians have been in their long durée criticism of the Weber Thesis and if they have succeeded in bringing into the open items originally included in Weber’s own thought about the change from the Protestant ethic to the ‘spirit’ of capitalism. Especially interesting is whether economic historians have used the more historical categories already proposed by Weber instead of the more universal categories and concepts preferred by other social scientists. Furthermore, does the criticism of the Weber Thesis imply that economic historians have had a better idea of what Weber thought as compared with other social scientists? Recently, however, a more tolerant, even accepting, view of the Weber Thesis appears to have emerged within the economic historical literature. As well-known examples one could mention David Landes and Niall Ferguson, who have recently supported the idea that, because culture makes all the difference, also Weber’s idea about religious attitudes as the catalyst for the rise of capitalism in the West should be given serious thought. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|