Staged Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Autor: | Cristina Sanina, David F. Briceño, Felipe N. Albuquerque, Ankur Kalra, Michael J. Attubato, Jose Wiley, Tanush Gupta, Wilman Olmedo, Michael Weinreich, Emily Ong, Mark Menegus, Harish Ramakrishna, Pedro A. Villablanca, Divyanshu Mohananey, Ibrahim Kassas, Thomas Brevik |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Percutaneous medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Coronary Angiography 03 medical and health sciences Electrocardiography 0302 clinical medicine Catheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions Internal medicine Intervention (counseling) medicine ST segment Humans In patient 030212 general & internal medicine Myocardial infarction ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction chronic total occlusion Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis business.industry Revascularization percutaneous coronary intervention Percutaneous coronary intervention medicine.disease medicine.anatomical_structure Treatment Outcome Coronary Occlusion meta‐analysis Meta-analysis Chronic Disease Cardiology ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery |
Zdroj: | Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
ISSN: | 2047-9980 |
Popis: | Background Studies have shown that chronic total occlusion ( CTO ) in a noninfarct‐related artery in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction is linked to increased mortality. It remains unclear whether staged revascularization of a noninfarct‐related artery CTO in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction translates to improved outcomes. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare outcomes between patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with concurrent CTO who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of noninfarct‐related artery CTO versus those who did not. Method and Results We conducted an electronic database search of all published data. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary end points were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, and heart failure readmission. Odds ratios ( ORs ) and 95% confidence intervals ( CIs ) were computed. Random effects model was used and heterogeneity was considered if I 2 >25. Six studies (n=1253 patients) were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events ( OR , 0.54; 95% CI , 0.32–0.91), cardiovascular mortality ( OR , 0.43; 95% CI , 0.20–0.95), and heart failure readmissions ( OR , 0.57; 95% CI , 0.36–0.89), favoring the patients in the CTO percutaneous coronary intervention group. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for all‐cause mortality ( OR , 0.47; 95% CI , 0.22–1.00), myocardial infarction ( OR , 0.78; 95% CI , 0.41–1.46), repeat revascularization ( OR , 1.13; 95% CI , 0.56–2.27), and stroke ( OR , 0.51; 95% CI , 0.20–1.33). Conclusions In this meta‐analysis, CTO percutaneous coronary intervention of the noninfarct‐related artery in patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure readmissions. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |