Socio-macroeconomic impacts of implementing different post-Brexit UK energy reduction targets to 2030
| Autor: | Paul E. Brockway, Hector Pollitt, John Barrett, Marco Sakai, Jaime Nieto, Lucy Clements |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Natural resource economics
Energy reduction Legislation Management Monitoring Policy and Law Reduction (complexity) General Energy Brexit Scale (social sciences) Economics media_common.cataloged_instance European union decent_work_and_economic_growth Baseline (configuration management) climate_action affordable_and_clean_energy Efficient energy use media_common |
| ISSN: | 0301-4215 |
| Popis: | For the period since 2011, the UK has been bound by European Union (EU) legislation regarding energy reduction targets to 2020. As of 2019, the UK had reduced its final energy use by 18% against a baseline projection to 2020, on track to meet its target of 18%. Whilst the rest of the EU-27 now set their own energy reduction targets to 2030, upon leaving the EU via Brexit, the UK is now free to choose its own energy targets. But what should the energy target be for 2030, and what are the socio-macroeconomic impacts and policy implications? To address this, we use two econometric energy-economy models to assess three different levels of energy reduction target, with 27%, 33% and 40% reduction in 2030 versus the baseline model projections. We find the strictest (40%) energy reduction target could deliver the largest economic and employment benefits. However, careful attention to policies are required, to ensure improvements to overall economy-wide energy efficiency whilst minimising rebound. Demand-side policies of serious scale within an ‘avoid-shift-improve’ framework are required, including massive building retrofits, significant improvements to industrial energy efficiency, switching to low energy transport modes, and moving away from meat-based diets. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect