Comparative analysis of variation in the quality and completeness of local outbreak control plans for SARS-CoV-2 in English local authorities
| Autor: | Mengye Li, Xinming Yu, Padmanabhan Badrinath, Avirup Chowdhury, Laurie Lawson-Portuphy |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Chowdhury, Avirup [0000-0001-9817-0603], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) media_common.quotation_subject communicable diseases Disease Variation (game tree) Disease Outbreaks health protection Statutory law medicine Mainstream Humans Quality (business) AcademicSubjects/MED00860 media_common business.industry SARS-CoV-2 Communication Significant difference Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Outbreak COVID-19 General Medicine Public relations communities Geography Research Design Family medicine Original Article Outbreak control business Completeness (statistics) |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England) |
| Popis: | Background Local outbreak control plans (LOCPs) are statutory documents produced by local authorities (LAs) across England. LOCPs outline LAs’ response to Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID19) outbreaks and the coordination of local resources, data and communication to support outbreak response. LOCPs are therefore crucial in the nation’s response to COVID-19. However, there has been no previous systematic assessment of these documents. We performed this study to systematically assess the quality of LOCPs and to offer recommendations of good practice. Methods All published LOCPs were assessed for basic characteristics. A framework based on Department of Health and Social Care guidelines was used to assess a random sample of LOCPs. Qualitative analysis was undertaken for LOCPs with highest completeness. Results Hundred and thirty-seven of 150 LAs publicly published a full LOCP; 9 were drafts. Statistical analysis demonstrated the significant difference between reporting of mainstream schools, care homes and the homeless population and other educational settings, high-risk settings and other vulnerable groups. LOCPs varied in approach when structuring outbreak response information and focused on different areas of outbreak management. Conclusions The majority of LAs are publicly accessible. There is significant variation between the reporting of high-risk settings and groups. Suggested recommendations may help to improve future LOCP updates. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|