Monitoring systems for resistance to plant protection products across the world: Between redundancy and complementarity

Autor: network, R4P, Barrès, Benoit, Corio-Costet, Marie-France, Debieu, Daniele, Délye, Christophe, Fillinger, Sabine, Gauffre, Bertrand, Le Goff, Gaëlle, Grosman, Jacques, Hannachi, Mourad, DE JERPHANION, Pauline, Jorgensen, Lise Nistrup, Plantamp, Christophe, Siegwart, Myriam, Walker, Anne-Sophie
Přispěvatelé: CAractérisation et Suivi des Phénomènes d'Evolution de Résistance aux pesticides (CASPER), Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Santé et agroécologie du vignoble (UMR SAVE), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin (ISVV)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), BIOlogie et GEstion des Risques en agriculture (BIOGER), AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Agroécologie [Dijon], Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Unité de recherche Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles (PSH), Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Institut Sophia Agrobiotech (ISA), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Direction Régionale de l'Alimentation, de l'Agriculture et de la Forêt Rhône-Alpes (DRAAF Rhône Alpes), Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires (SADAPT), Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES), Aarhus University [Aarhus], French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) via the tax on sales of plant protection products, Plant Health division of INRAE
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science, Wiley, 2021, pp.1-13. ⟨10.1002/ps.6275⟩
R4P 2021, ' Monitoring systems for resistance to plant protection products across the world: Between redundancy and complementarity ', Pest Management Science, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 2697-2709 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6275
ISSN: 1526-4998
1526-498X
Popis: BACKGROUNDMonitoring resistance to Plant Protection Products (PPPs) is crucial for understanding the evolution of resistances in bioagressors, thereby allowing scientists to design sound bioagressor management strategies. Globally, resistance monitoring is implemented by a wide range of actors that fall into three distinct categories: academic, governmental, and private. The purpose of this study was to investigate worldwide diversity in PPP resistance monitoring systems, and to shed light on their different facets.RESULTSA large survey involving 162 experts from 48 countries made it possible to identify and analyze 250 resistance monitoring systems. Through an in-depth analysis, the features of the different monitoring systems were identified. The main factor differentiating monitoring systems was essentially the capabilities (funding, manpower, technology, etc.) of the actors involved in each system. In most countries, and especially in those with a high Human Development Index, academic, governmental, and private monitoring systems coexist. Overall, systems focus far more on monitoring established resistances than on the detection of emerging resistances. Governmental and private resistance monitoring systems generally have considerable capacities to generate data, whereas academic resistance monitoring systems are more specialized. Governmental actors federate and enroll a wider variety of stakeholders.CONCLUSIONThe results show functional complementarities between the coexisting actors in countries where they coexist. We suggest PPP resistance monitoring might be enhanced if the different actors focus more on detecting emerging resistances (and associated benefits) and increase collaborative and collective efforts and transparency.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: