Now in the historical courtroom
| Autor: | Claudia Claridge |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Historical Pragmatics. :223-242 |
| ISSN: | 1569-9854 1566-5852 |
| DOI: | 10.1075/jhp.00020.cla |
| Popis: | The investigation of the pragmatic marker now in trial proceedings from 1560 to 1800 shows a genre-specific usage profile with regard to its uses and functions. Courtroom “professionals” (lawyers, judges and other officials) use now significantly more frequently than lay speakers (witnesses, victims and defendants). The former use it to segment and highlight stages in the argumentation, as well as to control and to disalign with others’ interactive behaviour. Self-defending litigants share these functional preferences to some extent, while all other lay persons use now for structuring their answers and dominantly in direct-speech contexts. Now in professional legal speech thus functions as a strategic metapragmatic framing strategy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|