Influence of Pediatric Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Resections on Midface and Skull Base Development
| Autor: | Parisa Oviedo, Javan Nation, Michael J. Levy, Steven Zamora, Daniel Vinocur |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Cephalometric analysis
Male medicine.medical_specialty Endoscopic endonasal surgery Tumor resection Imaging data Skull Base Neoplasms Surgical Flaps Postoperative Complications Chart review medicine Humans Child Retrospective Studies Skull Base medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Magnetic resonance imaging Endoscopy General Medicine Plastic Surgery Procedures Sagittal plane Surgery Skull medicine.anatomical_structure Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Female Neurology (clinical) business |
| Zdroj: | Pediatric neurosurgery. 56(4) |
| ISSN: | 1423-0305 |
| Popis: | Objective: The purpose of this study is to use imaging data to determine if endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for skull base tumor resection interrupts skull base growth and development, resulting in an atrophic midface skeletal structure, compared to matched normal controls. Methods: Data were collected by a retrospective chart review done on children aged 16 years and below who underwent endoscopic tumor resection and had pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with relevant midface anatomy. 121 normal controls were matched to 20 EES patients by age and gender. Three measurements related to midface anatomy were taken from 1 sagittal T1 slice and 1 axial T2 slice of each scan. Statistical analysis was used to compare growth measures between cases and controls. Results: Twenty patients who underwent EES between November 2015 and April 2018 met our inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients, 11 males and 9 females, was 10 years, and 8 patients (38%) were aged 7 years or younger. Six patients who had a high-flow CSF leak obtained a nasoseptal flap. A student T test and multivariate regression analysis found that EES did not affect midface and skull base growth. Among the variables assessed, age appears to be the only driver of growth. Conclusion: There were no identified differences in craniofacial growth in pediatric patients undergoing EES for skull base tumor resection as compared to the control group. EES does not appear to significantly interfere with midface/skull base development and is a good surgical option for pediatric patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|