Aversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica): a comparison of drones and workers
Autor: | David Philip Arthur Craig, Tugrul Giray, Charles I. Abramson, Christopher A. Varnon, Christopher W. Dinges, Zoe M. Austin, Arian Avalos, Fatima Nur Dal, Harrington Wells |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Mustafakemalpaşa Meslek Yüksekokulu/Arıcılık Geliştirme-Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi., Dal, Fatıma Nur, Giray, Tuğrul |
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Male
Punishment (psychology) Turkey Physiology Honeybee Model system Audiology Turkey (republic) Honey Bees Escape Reaction Discrimination Conditioning Psychological Mechanisms Workers Response Frequency Brain Bees Division-of-labor Shock (circulatory) Volume changes Female medicine.symptom Psychology medicine.medical_specialty Plasticity Animals Apis Mellifera Aquatic Science Aversive conditioning Proboscis extension Honey bees Article Aversion conditioning Learning-performance Punishment Object-oriented modeling medicine Avoidance Learning Escape behavior Molecular Biology Biology Bee Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Life sciences & biomedicine - other topics Drones Communication Mushroom bodies business.industry Animal Avoidance behavior Behavioral-development Drone Insect Science Conditioning (psychology) Animal Science and Zoology Comparative study business Conditioning |
Zdroj: | The Journal of experimental biology. 216(Pt 21) |
ISSN: | 1477-9145 |
Popis: | Honey bees provide a model system to elucidate the relationship between sociality and complex behaviors within the same species, as females (workers) are highly social and males (drones) are more solitary. We report on aversive learning studies in drone and worker honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica) in escape, punishment and discriminative punishment situations. In all three experiments, a newly developed electric shock avoidance assay was used. The comparisons of expected and observed responses were performed with conventional statistical methods and a systematic randomization modeling approach called object oriented modeling. The escape experiment consisted of two measurements recorded in a master-yoked paradigm: frequency of response and latency to respond following administration of shock. Master individuals could terminate an unavoidable shock triggered by a decrementing 30 s timer by crossing the shuttlebox centerline following shock activation. Across all groups, there was large individual response variation. When assessing group response frequency and latency, master subjects performed better than yoked subjects for both workers and drones. In the punishment experiment, individuals were shocked upon entering the shock portion of a bilaterally wired shuttlebox. The shock portion was spatially static and unsignalled. Only workers effectively avoided the shock. The discriminative punishment experiment repeated the punishment experiment but included a counterbalanced blue and yellow background signal and the side of shock was manipulated. Drones correctly responded less than workers when shock was paired with blue. However, when shock was paired with yellow there was no observable difference between drones and workers. National Science Foundation -- DBI 0552717 National Science Foundation -- 1263327 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |