Induced radiofrequency fields in patients undergoing MR examinations: insights for risk assessment
Autor: | Aiping Yao, Tolga Goren, Wolfgang Kainz, Manuel Murbach, Earl Zastrow, Niels Kuster |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) induced RF fields Astm standard Radio Waves ASTM phantom Population radiofrequency (RF) exposure Risk Assessment Imaging phantom AIMD PIMD incident RF fields medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging In patient education education.field_of_study Radiological and Ultrasound Technology medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Phantoms Imaging Specific absorption rate Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Implant business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Physics in Medicine and Biology, 66 (18) |
ISSN: | 1361-6560 0031-9155 |
DOI: | 10.3929/ethz-b-000506503 |
Popis: | Purpose. To characterize and quantify the induced radiofrequency (RF) electric (E)-fields and B (1+rms) fields in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) examinations; to provide guidance on aspects of RF heating risks for patients with and without implants; and to discuss some strengths and limitations of safety assessments in current ISO, IEC, and ASTM standards to determine the RF heating risks for patients with and without implants. Methods. Induced E-fields and B (1+rms) fields during 1.5 T and 3 T MR examinations were numerically estimated for high-resolution patient models of the Virtual Population exposed to ten two-port birdcage RF coils from head to feet imaging landmarks over the full polarization space, as well as in surrogate ASTM phantoms. Results. Worst-case B (1+rms) exposure greater than 3.5 mu T (1.5 T) and 2 mu T (3 T) must be considered for all MR examinations at the Normal Operating Mode limit. Representative induced E-field and specific absorption rate distributions under different clinical scenarios allow quick estimation of clinical factors of high and reduced exposure. B (1) shimming can cause +6 dB enhancements to E-fields along implant trajectories. The distribution and magnitude of induced E-fields in the ASTM phantom differ from clinical exposures and are not always conservative for typical implant locations. Conclusions. Field distributions in patient models are condensed, visualized for quick estimation of risks, and compared to those induced in the ASTM phantom. Induced E-fields in patient models can significantly exceed those in the surrogate ASTM phantom in some cases. In the recent 19( epsilon 2) revision of the ASTM F2182 standard, the major shortcomings of previous versions have been addressed by requiring that the relationship between ASTM test conditions and in vivo tangential E-fields be established, e.g. numerically. With this requirement, the principal methods defined in the ASTM standard for passive implants are reconciled with those of the ISO 10974 standard for active implantable medical devices. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 66 (18) ISSN:1361-6560 ISSN:0031-9155 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |