| Popis: |
The concept that imagination can be considered a conscious experience at its most basic level has gained widespread acceptance in recent years. This is the method adopted towards it throughout the entire canon of philosophical literature throughout its entire history. Likewise, this is the approach taken towards it. In fact, a considerable number of people who have held this position for a considerable time believe that the claim is so obvious that it does not need any compelling support. However, recent research dealing with imagination in philosophy has shown a growingbody of evidence for the concept that daydreaming is not necessarily consciously occurring. According to the findings of the research, this is indeed the case. Kendall Walton (1990), Alvin Goldman (2006), Jennifer Church (2008), Neil Van Leeuwen (2011, 2014), Bence Nanay (2013), Shannon Spaulding (2016), Berit Brogaard and Dimitria Gatzia (2017) and Ema Sullivan - Bissett are some of the theorists who acknowledge the existence of unconscious imagination or something remarkably like it. Other theorists who acknowledge the existence of unconscious imagination include Benim Nanay (2013), Neil Van. Walton's theory was first presented in a published form in 1990. 2006 saw the release of the first edition of Goldman. The stance the church took was (2019). While several of these theories postulate that phantom processes can occur in the unconscious without supplying an explanation to support this assumption, a few of these theorist’s supply evidence to support this view. Within the confines of this article, one of the topics we would like to delve deeper into is the philosophical foundations of unconscious imagination. In this section, we will concentrate on the four main types of reasons presented to justify its continued existence. These explanations were made to justify its longer existence. It is not necessary to give any of these concerns the thoughtful consideration they deserve, as I will explain below that this is not the case. Added lines of defense can be created, but given the current state of the debate, the suggestion that we should assume unconscious daydreaming appears not to be well motivated. While added lines of defense can be set up, added lines of defense may not be set up. It is conceivable to build more defensive lines, but it is also possible that added lines of defense cannot be installed. In either case, added lines of defense can be set up. This is the case despite the possibility of setting up more lines of defense in the future. |
