Characterization of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Interactions with Human Tropoelastin

Autor: Daniel V. Bax, David S. Celermajer, Giselle C. Yeo, Martin K.C. Ng, Young Yu, Kim H. Chan, Praveesuda L. Michael, Louise L. Dunn, Anthony S. Weiss, Matti A. Hiob, Elysse C. Filipe, Steven G. Wise, Gloria S. C. Yuen, Hamid Hajian
Přispěvatelé: Bax, Daniel [0000-0002-1162-5319], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Zdroj: PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 6, p e0131101 (2015)
ISSN: 1932-6203
Popis: The deployment of endovascular implants such as stents in the treatment of cardiovascular disease damages the vascular endothelium, increasing the risk of thrombosis and promoting neointimal hyperplasia. The rapid restoration of a functional endothelium is known to reduce these complications. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are increasingly recognized as important contributors to device re-endothelialization. Extracellular matrix proteins prominent in the vessel wall may enhance EPC-directed re-endothelialization. We examined attachment, spreading and proliferation on recombinant human tropoelastin (rhTE) and investigated the mechanism and site of interaction. EPCs attached and spread on rhTE in a dose dependent manner, reaching a maximal level of 56±3% and 54±3%, respectively. EPC proliferation on rhTE was comparable to vitronectin, fibronectin and collagen. EDTA, but not heparan sulfate or lactose, reduced EPC attachment by 81±3%, while full attachment was recovered after add-back of manganese, inferring a classical integrin-mediated interaction. Integrin αVβ3 blocking antibodies decreased EPC adhesion and spreading on rhTE by 39±3% and 56±10% respectively, demonstrating a large contribution from this specific integrin. Attachment of EPCs on N-terminal rhTE constructs N25 and N18 accounted for most of this interaction, accompanied by comparable spreading. In contrast, attachment and spreading on N10 was negligible. αVβ3 blocking antibodies reduced EPC spreading on both N25 and N18 by 45±4% and 42±14%, respectively. In conclusion, rhTE supports EPC binding via an integrin mechanism involving αVβ3. N25 and N18, but not N10 constructs of rhTE contribute to EPC binding. The regulation of EPC activity by rhTE may have implications for modulation of the vascular biocompatibility of endovascular implants.
Databáze: OpenAIRE